Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Men's Group

loli phabay

(5,580 posts)

37. reply

Reply to ProudToBeBlueInRhody (Reply #23)

Thu Jul 12, 2012, 02:57 AM

Jul 2012

i disagree, people enjoy all sorts of stuff that enjoy others dont, each persons meal is from a different part of the fish.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WTF! BDSM in the RCMP? ITEOTWAWKI! [View all] Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 OP

So what is the official position on BDSM? ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2012 #1

Sherlock Holmes would not approve. Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #2

In all seriousness, I read the essay posted ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2012 #3

I may get into it in depth later, if I feel so inclined, but the piece itself really reads like a Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #4

That brings up a good point.. Upton Jul 2012 #7

wait... what did I miss?? opiate69 Jul 2012 #5

This Major Nikon Jul 2012 #10

Thanks, Major.... opiate69 Jul 2012 #11

I have a simple suggestion for that Major Nikon Jul 2012 #12

They took care of that discrepancy 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #13

Another thing I've noticed Major Nikon Jul 2012 #15

Yep yep yep... opiate69 Jul 2012 #16

Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries! 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #31

lmao! exactly! opiate69 Jul 2012 #32

Here's an "even more super sexxxy picture of a woman" in her honor. lumberjack_jeff Jul 2012 #19

Odd how, in my porn-addled male gaze objectifying misogyny, I forgot to not take her seriously Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #20

"want to talk about people who can frame the economic arguments better, there's your go-to person" lumberjack_jeff Jul 2012 #21

Sounds like "nice guy" talk, Warren ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2012 #22

Please, please! Allow me to mansplain! Er, sorry, explain! Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #25

Seems simple enough.... opiate69 Jul 2012 #14

Apparently, the idea that the ever-expanding list of people who've been blocked from that group Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #17

Here's my offering ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2012 #24

Yep. There are a whole long list of happy, unapologetic porn people who fuck up the narrative. Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #26

speaking of Nina Hartley.. opiate69 Jul 2012 #33

Post removed Post removed Jul 2012 #36

Very confused.... opiate69 Jul 2012 #39

not very well lumberjack_jeff Jul 2012 #40

This message was self-deleted by its author Upton Jul 2012 #6

Targeted for being kinky.. Upton Jul 2012 #8

No, they are all "victims" ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2012 #23

reply loli phabay Jul 2012 #37

Once again the radical left and radical right are indistinguishable from each other 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #9

I promised a bit of a breakdown on the original article, scare quotes and all, so here goes Part I: Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #18

Part II: Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #27

And, now, for the armchair psychoanalysis bit: Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #28

Very well stated, Warren. opiate69 Jul 2012 #29

It kind of reminds me of the way many closeted fundamentalists 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #30

musta hit a nerve. Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #34

Cognitive dissonance leads to denial and projection. hifiguy Jul 2012 #38

It doesn`t surprise me that this happened in Vancouver opiate69 Jul 2012 #35