Mark Shields' comments on JK role in debate prep (his own correction. .)

[Mass]

8. Good to see some people are honest and do some fact checking.

Which is more I can say from Joan Vennochi, who has her contractually mandated "Kerry is a loser" column:
http://bostonglobe.com/opinion/2012/10/06/john-kerry-career-dreams-keep-slipping-away/W57xqx62U9syExYZghPFfI/story.html

Where she states that Kerry is a loser (and will not become SoS) because
a/ Michel Moore said so (I guess)
b/ He defended Susan Rice while doing his job and asking the administration to be accountable.
c/He is too cautious and middle ground (I guess she prefers people who rush to judgement like, say, Bush?)

and finally this canard that has been going through Boston's papers and drives me nuts: Kerry will not be SoS if Warren wins. So, what are we people supposed to do? Vote Brown Of course, they are correct that, should the Senate be 50-50 and Warren wins, he probably will not. Is it worth the ink to print this? I have to say it drives me nuts more by the certainty that none of the presumed candidates could beat Brown. Really? Aside the fact I am not sure he would be the nominee if he loses this race, could people (including the DSCC) stop denigrating our MA Democrats. May be they should endorse Brown directly.