HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Places » U.S. » Texas (Group) » Court enjoins enforcement... » Reply #7
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Response to Gothmog (Reply #6)

Wed Aug 8, 2012, 02:03 PM

7. TX Redistricting had a bit on it


TX Redistricting blog 8/07/12
Plaintiffs’ reply to Texas’ request to stay voter registration ruling


Voting for America’s reply to the State of Texas’ request to have Judge Costa stay his voter registration ruling can be found here.

The court has scheduled a hearing on the stay request for Wednesday, August 8, at 4:00 p.m.

From the reply:

wholly fails to articulate what difficulty arises from allowing voting organizations to use perforamance-based metrics, photocopy completed voter registration applications, submit the applications by mail, or operate in multiple counties. To the extent that out-of-state canvassers cause an increased administrative burden on counties to accept and process VDR applications, the burden is slight. Moreover, two of the provisions - the Compensation Prohibition and the In-State Restriction - are only recent policy interpretations.


This post is so short I just included it all here.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 13 replies Author Time Post
Gothmog Aug 2012 OP
Celebrate2012Victory Aug 2012 #1
NoPasaran Aug 2012 #2
Gothmog Aug 2012 #3
sonias Aug 2012 #4
onestepforward Aug 2012 #5
Gothmog Aug 2012 #6
LineLineNew Reply TX Redistricting had a bit on it
sonias Aug 2012 #7
Gothmog Aug 2012 #8
Gothmog Aug 2012 #9
sonias Aug 2012 #10
sonias Aug 2012 #11
Gothmog Aug 2012 #12
thevoiceofreason Aug 2012 #13
Please login to view edit histories.