HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Places » U.S. » Minnesota (Group) » We need a constitutional ... » Reply #1
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU
In the discussion thread: We need a constitutional amendment [View all]

Response to wellstone dem (Original post)

Wed Nov 7, 2012, 04:11 PM

1. I like the second proposal better

Putting it in the Governor's hands gives an awful lot of power to whoever's doing that job at the moment (it won't always be Dayton -- or even a Dem).

The 2/3 vote should be a little more consistent.

Generally, I don't think these ballot amendments are a good idea. They allow demagogues to flood the airwaves with propaganda and bypass the normal legislative process. Worse, they don't change laws, they change the constitution.

Thankfully, neither one passed this time, but I'd be happier if it were almost impossible to do this at all.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 7 replies Author Time Post
wellstone dem Nov 2012 OP
LineNew Reply I like the second proposal better
FiveGoodMen Nov 2012 #1
thefool_wa Nov 2012 #2
trotsky Nov 2012 #3
dflprincess Nov 2012 #4
trotsky Nov 2012 #5
question everything Nov 2012 #6
daveMN Nov 2012 #7
Please login to view edit histories.