HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Places » U.S. » California (Group) » just about the only bad r... » Reply #41
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Response to mike_c (Reply #19)

Thu Nov 8, 2012, 01:35 PM

41. I think I'll trust the research and studies so far.

Curious though, what is your degree?
And BTW I didn't say that GMOs produce anti-anxiety or anti-depression compounds.

There is real science out there that at the very least raises red flags and screams caution about GMOs. There is natural radiation too but that doesn't mean I want to live near Fukashima or Chernobel. And not all chemicals are safe. Try telling that to the people that lived in Love Canal.

2011--Maternal and fetal exposure to pesticides associated to genetically modified foods in Eastern Townships of Quebec, Canada.
Aris A, Leblanc S.
Source
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Sherbrooke Hospital Centre, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
-http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21338670

2011--Corn allergies are on the rise, and while some genetically modified corn is engineered to withstand Monsanto's herbicide Roundup, other varieties are engineered to create their own internal pesticide (Bt toxin). The biotech industry claimed there were no health risks to worry about from these altered foods. In the case of Bt corn, the concern that your gut might turn into a pesticide factory was shrugged off with lame assurances that the Bt toxin wouldn't survive once ingested.

However, just last month, a study revealed that Bt toxin was detected in:

93 percent of maternal blood samples
80 percent of fetal blood samples
69 percent of non-pregnant women blood samples
Turns out you cannot replace actual safety studies with lip service after all. Another recent review of 19 animal studies on genetically modified organisms (GMO) revealed that nearly 10 percent of blood, urine, organ and other parameters tested were significantly influenced by GMOs, with the liver and kidneys faring the worst. Additionally, Jeffrey Smith, executive director of the Institute for Responsible Technology and author of two books on the topic, has previously documented more than 65 serious health risks from GM products of all kinds.

Among them:

Offspring of rats fed GM soy showed a five-fold increase in mortality, lower birth weights, and the inability to reproduce
Male mice fed GM soy had damaged young sperm cells
The embryo offspring of GM soy-fed mice had altered DNA functioning
Several US farmers reported sterility or fertility problems among pigs and cows fed on GM corn varieties
-http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/06/14/why-are-there-so-many-food-allergies-now.aspx

2008--J Agric Food Chem. 2008 Dec 10;56(23):11533-9.
Intestinal and peripheral immune response to MON810 maize ingestion in weaning and old mice.
Finamore A, Roselli M, Britti S, Monastra G, Ambra R, Turrini A, Mengheri E.
Source
Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca per gli Alimenti e la Nutrizione, Roma, Italy.
Abstract
This study evaluated the gut and peripheral immune response to genetically modified (GM) maize in mice in vulnerable conditions. Weaning and old mice were fed a diet containing MON810 or its parental control maize or a pellet diet containing a GM-free maize for 30 and 90 days. The immunophenotype of intestinal intraepithelial, spleen, and blood lymphocytes of control maize fed mice was similar to that of pellet fed mice. As compared to control maize, MON810 maize induced alterations in the percentage of T and B cells and of CD4(+), CD8(+), gammadeltaT, and alphabetaT subpopulations of weaning and old mice fed for 30 or 90 days, respectively, at the gut and peripheral sites. An increase of serum IL-6, IL-13, IL-12p70, and MIP-1beta after MON810 feeding was also found. These results suggest the importance of the gut and peripheral immune response to GM crop ingestion as well as the age of the consumer in the GMO safety evaluation.
-http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19007233

2007--Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2007 May;52(4):596-602. Epub 2007 Mar 13.
New analysis of a rat feeding study with a genetically modified maize reveals signs of hepatorenal toxicity.
Séralini GE, Cellier D, de Vendomois JS.
Source
Committee for Independent Information and Research on Genetic Engineering CRIIGEN, Paris, France. criigen@unicaen.fr
Abstract
Health risk assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) cultivated for food or feed is under debate throughout the world, and very little data have been published on mid- or long-term toxicological studies with mammals. One of these studies performed under the responsibility of Monsanto Company with a transgenic corn MON863 has been subjected to questions from regulatory reviewers in Europe, where it was finally approved in 2005. This necessitated a new assessment of kidney pathological findings, and the results remained controversial. An Appeal Court action in Germany (Münster) allowed public access in June 2005 to all the crude data from this 90-day rat-feeding study. We independently re-analyzed these data. Appropriate statistics were added, such as a multivariate analysis of the growth curves, and for biochemical parameters comparisons between GMO-treated rats and the controls fed with an equivalent normal diet, and separately with six reference diets with different compositions. We observed that after the consumption of MON863, rats showed slight but dose-related significant variations in growth for both sexes, resulting in 3.3% decrease in weight for males and 3.7% increase for females. Chemistry measurements reveal signs of hepatorenal toxicity, marked also by differential sensitivities in males and females. Triglycerides increased by 24-40% in females (either at week 14, dose 11% or at week 5, dose 33%, respectively); urine phosphorus and sodium excretions diminished in males by 31-35% (week 14, dose 33%) for the most important results significantly linked to the treatment in comparison to seven diets tested. Longer experiments are essential in order to indicate the real nature and extent of the possible pathology; with the present data it cannot be concluded that GM corn MON863 is a safe product.
-http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17356802

2009--Also, because of the mounting data, it is biologically plausible for Genetically Modified Foods to cause adverse health effects in humans.
Another often used definition originated from an environmental meeting in the United States in 1998 stating: "When an activity raises threats to the environment or human health, precautionary measures should be taken, even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically. In this context, the proponent of an activity, rather than the public, should bear the burden of proof (of the safety of the activity)."13
With the precautionary principle in mind, because GM foods have not been properly tested for human consumption, and because there is ample evidence of probable harm, the AAEM asks:

Physicians to educate their patients, the medical community, and the public to avoid GM foods when possible and provide educational materials concerning GM foods and health risks.

Physicians to consider the possible role of GM foods in the disease processes of the patients they treat and to document any changes in patient health when changing from GM food to non-GM food.

Our members, the medical community, and the independent scientific community to gather case studies potentially related to GM food consumption and health effects, begin epidemiological research to investigate the role of GM foods on human health, and conduct safe methods of determining the effect of GM foods on human health.

For a moratorium on GM food, implementation of immediate long term independent safety testing, and labeling of GM foods, which is necessary for the health and safety of consumers.
-http://www.aaemonline.org/gmopost.html



Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 48 replies Author Time Post
mike_c Nov 2012 OP
JDPriestly Nov 2012 #1
mike_c Nov 2012 #4
SoapBox Nov 2012 #6
Gormy Cuss Nov 2012 #14
mike_c Nov 2012 #18
proverbialwisdom Nov 2012 #37
proverbialwisdom Nov 2012 #40
Gormy Cuss Nov 2012 #46
kestrel91316 Nov 2012 #7
mike_c Nov 2012 #8
cui bono Nov 2012 #13
mike_c Nov 2012 #16
cui bono Nov 2012 #21
mike_c Nov 2012 #24
cui bono Nov 2012 #26
mike_c Nov 2012 #27
cui bono Nov 2012 #47
proverbialwisdom Nov 2012 #36
proverbialwisdom Nov 2012 #35
underseasurveyor Nov 2012 #9
mike_c Nov 2012 #11
underseasurveyor Nov 2012 #17
mike_c Nov 2012 #19
Tumbulu Nov 2012 #29
mike_c Nov 2012 #38
Tumbulu Nov 2012 #43
underseasurveyor Nov 2012 #45
LineLineLineLineLineLineLineNew Reply I think I'll trust the research and studies so far.
underseasurveyor Nov 2012 #41
mike_c Nov 2012 #42
underseasurveyor Nov 2012 #44
pinto Nov 2012 #20
mike_c Nov 2012 #23
pinto Nov 2012 #25
Tumbulu Nov 2012 #30
JDPriestly Nov 2012 #31
AndyTiedye Nov 2012 #48
LoisB Nov 2012 #2
frylock Nov 2012 #3
mike_c Nov 2012 #5
cui bono Nov 2012 #15
petronius Nov 2012 #10
mike_c Nov 2012 #12
pinto Nov 2012 #22
Raine Nov 2012 #28
proverbialwisdom Nov 2012 #32
proverbialwisdom Nov 2012 #33
proverbialwisdom Nov 2012 #34
proverbialwisdom Nov 2012 #39
Please login to view edit histories.