Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Arizona

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

scottban

(35 posts)
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 11:22 AM Feb 2012

Arizona & Arpaio in Federal Court [View all]

Heredia is a Surprise AZ cop. The Fed. Judge on the case is a Bush appointee and seeks to bury this case. Note the Nelson mentioned below is a top advisor/crony of Arpaio. See www.sheriff-arpaio.com. Outrageously, civil litigation (protected speech) is a crime in AZ under the plain language of the harassment statute. The below motion deals with the use of the statute to protect Arpaio cronies from litigation and legal process. Original formatting not intact below.


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Scott Huminski, )
Plaintiff, ) CIVIL ACTION
)
-V- )
) DOCKET NO. 2:11-cv-00896-DGC
Hector Heredia, et al., )
Defendants. )

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION RE: ENFORCEMENT OF ARIZONA Rev Stat § 13-2921,
MOTION TO JOIN PARTIES

NOW COMES, plaintiff Scott Huminski and pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 65(a) moves for preliminary injunction preventing the enforcement of AZ Rev Stat § 13-2921 as the plain language of the statute unconstitutionally criminalizes civil litigation in violation of the First Amendment and Due Process. The statute criminalizes speech that "alarms, annoys or harasses". All of these traits are unavoidable consequences of litigation and legal process. Criminalizing litigation violates the free speech and due process provisions of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
Plaintiff concurrently moves to join the following parties pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 19(a) to afford complete injunctive relief:
Lynn Arouh, Prosecutor, Town of Gilbert, Arizona,
Gary Verburg, City Attorney, Phoenix, Arizona,
Debbie Spinner, City Attorney, Mesa, Arizona,
Michael Bailey, City Attorney, City of Surprise, Arizona,
Arizona, State of,
Tom Horne, Arizona Attorney General,
William Montgomery, Maricopa (Arizona) County Attorney.
This suit arose out of the Surprise Police email sent pursuant to AZ Rev Stat § 13-2921 to Plaintiff the day prior to a civil hearing in Mesa Municipal Court thereby manipulating, tampering with and obstructing the civil case Huminski v. Nelson, forcing Scott Huminski to absent himself from that hearing to avoid criminal liability and arrest,
"Please do not have any type of contact with either Michael Nelson [sic] or ... ".

Both the statute and the police email are unconstitutionally vague and vastly over broad. Their enforcement must be enjoined. The City of Phoenix Police refused to investigate an assault in support of and compliance with AZ Rev Stat § 13-2921 concerning the delivery of legal papers at the County Attorney's Office in collateral federal litigation.
Dated at Gilbert, Arizona this 7th day of February, 2012.


_________________________
Scott Huminski, pro per

A copy of the foregoing was served upon William Doyle, 1313 E. Osborn Rd. #220, Phoenix, AZ 85014, on February 7, 2012, by hand-delivery or First Class Mail, prepaid. Copies were also forwarded to the proposed joined parties.


____________________
Scott Huminski

39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
not being a lawyer and all, perhaps you could explain this OffWithTheirHeads Feb 2012 #1
Legalease scottban Feb 2012 #3
Sotomayor scottban Feb 2012 #5
Sotomayor did not write that 'opinion.' msanthrope Feb 2012 #36
Do you still believe that Sonia Sotomayor should not be on the US Supreme Court? Ptah Feb 2012 #2
sotomayor scottban Feb 2012 #4
I agree, her position on the court is permanent. Ptah Feb 2012 #8
Is your attorney still practising law? msanthrope Feb 2012 #11
Fascist thinking scottban Feb 2012 #14
So you aren't an attorney, then? msanthrope Feb 2012 #15
Attack the messenger scottban Feb 2012 #16
Howard Dean and Sonia Sotomayor are part of the conspiracy msanthrope Feb 2012 #19
What are your legal credentials? scottban Feb 2012 #23
Is that what the www.howarddeanvermont.com states or can't you read. scottban Feb 2012 #25
Are you a conspiracy nut -- nothing of the kind is in the book scottban Feb 2012 #26
Been there scottban Feb 2012 #6
What case did you argue before Sotomayor? msanthrope Feb 2012 #7
Case 2d cir. scottban Feb 2012 #9
But you aren't the attorney. Tell us about the felony you pled to. msanthrope Feb 2012 #10
Read the book scottban Feb 2012 #12
old news scottban Feb 2012 #13
You authored the pleadings but didn't sign them? msanthrope Feb 2012 #17
Just assert your support for Arpaio and get it over with scottban Feb 2012 #21
Any DUer can google my user name msanthrope Feb 2012 #22
Tell us about your support for Sheriff Arpaio scottban Feb 2012 #18
Why not google my username on this site? msanthrope Feb 2012 #20
Arpaio's crony threatened to kill my wife. scottban Feb 2012 #24
I'm guessing you found my anti-Arpaio threads. msanthrope Feb 2012 #32
OK Legal Expert scottban Feb 2012 #27
Debunk the below case law and save Sotomayor, legal expert scottban Feb 2012 #28
That's not how it works. 4 federal judges have shot you msanthrope Feb 2012 #35
I would like to know if you enjoy Ptah Feb 2012 #29
Cactus are fine scottban Feb 2012 #30
I have not encountered anyone on DU that supports Arpaio. Ptah Feb 2012 #31
Post removed Post removed Feb 2012 #33
None of those links are to anyone on DU supporting Arpaio. Ptah Feb 2012 #34
I want you to be banned from here. Ptah Feb 2012 #37
This poster is no longer with us. cyberswede Feb 2012 #38
scottban is banned uppityperson Feb 2012 #39
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Arizona»Arizona & Arpaio in F...»Reply #0