Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The DU Lounge
In reply to the discussion: Why is Passive Aggressive a bad thing? [View all]In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)17. It isn't really emotional withdrawal.
The passive aggressive is fighting for some degree of control. Obviously they cannot control what is truly troubling them. They deliberately do things that are aggressive. If they are allowed to get away with their behavior they feel successful. If confronted they still get attention. It's a win-win for the suffering passive aggressive person.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What if the passive-aggressive behavior is a response to a situation that autocratically is
Baitball Blogger
Dec 2012
#4
The Art of War teaches to attack an opponent's weakness through asymmetrical combat.
Chan790
Dec 2012
#9
Your father would be in the position of power, so I could absolutely understand
Baitball Blogger
Dec 2012
#12
Well put. That puts the whole passive-aggressive thing in perspective.
Baitball Blogger
Dec 2012
#19
It's deemed cowardly, sneaky, etc because folks using it are hard to identify
HereSince1628
Dec 2012
#22
Keep all of that in mind, because some day soon I will be asking for support
Baitball Blogger
Dec 2012
#42
Truly would be a different world if we ALL operated under these rules.
Baitball Blogger
Dec 2012
#33
Effective label to stick on opponent, since counter responses have been refined
retread
Dec 2012
#43