Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

Showing Original Post only (View all)
88 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I don't know EdwardBernays Jun 2016 #1
Sanders can't lead a relvoution either: he was rejected by many people lewebley3 Jun 2016 #29
No, people voted for the corporatism alternative. It's akin to Stockholm Syndrome. FighttheFuture Jun 2016 #39
I don't have Stockholm Syndrome. How many Banking Bills did Bernie submit, like EVER? nt LaydeeBug Jun 2016 #47
And that's why you support a person who's cleary in line with Wall Street and the bankers? Mmm.. ok FighttheFuture Jun 2016 #83
again...HOW many bills did Bernie introduce? Because talk is cheap LaydeeBug Jun 2016 #84
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #85
Nice try. No dice. It *is* the conversation..like exactly LaydeeBug Jun 2016 #86
No it isn't. Go back and reread the thread. FighttheFuture Jun 2016 #87
see post #47 nt LaydeeBug Jun 2016 #88
So was Hillary OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #60
This must be more of that unity stuff. Gomez163 Jun 2016 #2
or maybe more of that reality stuff virtualobserver Jun 2016 #3
God he has a clear mind and command of speaking swhisper1 Jun 2016 #10
He knows better. OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #61
keep going Senator Sanders - we are united behind you! ish of the hammer Jun 2016 #8
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #30
Yes we are. 840high Jun 2016 #51
It's not that she can't - she *won't*. And it was never her intent to do so. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2016 #4
Spot On. Phlem Jun 2016 #20
She is practical. apcalc Jun 2016 #34
She 'won't.' That is it in rwo words. pangaia Jun 2016 #78
Exactly right. nikto Jun 2016 #81
Bernie is keeping the pressure on, for the sake of Change/Reform Equinox Moon Jun 2016 #5
no, most of them folded under pressure. Bernie wont be blackmailed swhisper1 Jun 2016 #28
If he doesn't start helping: he will be a villain lewebley3 Jun 2016 #31
He is helping, that's the point Equinox Moon Jun 2016 #38
You mean selling out, chapdrum Jun 2016 #40
The Opposite Of Selling Out scottie55 Jun 2016 #50
Bobby Kennedy would have. OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #62
You could be right Equinox Moon Jun 2016 #66
seems legit ! stonecutter357 Jun 2016 #6
I don't want a revolution. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #7
they never work out if people dont try. What you call steady progress is not swhisper1 Jun 2016 #11
Just remember; Trump would be a 'revolution' too. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #15
Or Republicans, at least that's what we're told every election. Phlem Jun 2016 #21
he would certainly cause one, but you are citing civil war, which is not productive swhisper1 Jun 2016 #24
You are correct CrowCity: revolutions are bad ideas: hardwork is needed for Change lewebley3 Jun 2016 #32
POLITICAL Revolution means that the goals of said revolution would be acheived through legislation liberalnarb Jun 2016 #56
I'm just saying you can't control a revolution. You can't say nothing bad will happen. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #59
So basically you are not living in poverty, passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #57
Bernie can't even win the Dem Party nomination. Gamecock Lefty Jun 2016 #9
because his revolutionaries reach far beyond Dems. Even election fraud could not silence swhisper1 Jun 2016 #13
Your suspicions are certainly imaginative and quite florid, like hallicinations I imagine. L. Coyote Jun 2016 #53
nixon , both a pres and a loser. W also a pres and a loser swhisper1 Jun 2016 #58
Point of Fact: Hillary has not won the Dem nomination either Melissa G Jun 2016 #22
She was won: Sanders has lost: he lost fair and sqaure lewebley3 Jun 2016 #33
2,383 delegate votes needed to win Melissa G Jun 2016 #46
I am looking for someone who can lead the country liberal N proud Jun 2016 #12
you cannot lead a country that is owned by corporations swhisper1 Jun 2016 #14
Exactly. chapdrum Jun 2016 #42
Corporations, that Yuuuge generality, includes Bernie supporters, but no coprporation can be Prez. L. Coyote Jun 2016 #43
Can you be a little clearer? OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #63
I'm trying to get someone else to be a LOT clearer about their speech and thinking. L. Coyote Jun 2016 #71
Im a corp too. Not all corp buy polititians, dont be flippant. swhisper1 Jun 2016 #76
I have to argue with that All communications, pricesetting and votes in congress are dominently swhisper1 Jun 2016 #67
Now you are maligning the Democratic Party and our fine reps and senators. L. Coyote Jun 2016 #72
oh my god. bye-bye swhisper1 Jun 2016 #75
Indeed Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2016 #35
But it only takes a few thousand years to rebuild civilization, so let's all revolt now. L. Coyote Jun 2016 #73
Neither can you buddy. iandhr Jun 2016 #16
He has the majority of americans. the 99% are listening and jumping on board swhisper1 Jun 2016 #25
The "political revolution" is a fraud based on a premise that the voters rejected Renew Deal Jun 2016 #17
correction-half the dems rejected, not the 99% swhisper1 Jun 2016 #26
Your math doesn't add up Renew Deal Jun 2016 #27
She's not trying to lead a political revolution. Baitball Blogger Jun 2016 #18
She IS the Status quo. Phlem Jun 2016 #19
Nope - no revolution. yallerdawg Jun 2016 #23
Most Dems don't want a revolution dcbuckeye Jun 2016 #36
He's still attacking the presumed nominee of our party? patsimp Jun 2016 #37
Not really... Saviolo Jun 2016 #48
if she were for change I would agree with you, but I do not see sincerety from her. swhisper1 Jun 2016 #68
Yes she can, but the job description isn't "lead a political revolution" now is it. Plus .... L. Coyote Jun 2016 #41
Was making Maggie Thatcher the PM a revolution in Britain? Jack Rabbit Jun 2016 #45
She doesn't WANT to lead a Political Revolution Night Watchman Jun 2016 #44
Storm is coming maindawg Jun 2016 #49
+1000 Phlem Jun 2016 #52
thank you dawg, I am part of that storm. I dont forget and I dont lay down swhisper1 Jun 2016 #69
Clinton doesn't claim to be a revolutionary. geek tragedy Jun 2016 #54
She is a corporate paraclete of the Trilateral Commission stripe OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #64
that's a classic, 3 more days! nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #65
Correlation between post count and Republican talking points is higher than the probability Bush L. Coyote Jun 2016 #74
I'm new here, checking out threads, stopping by to say hi. lapucelle Jun 2016 #55
wear your armour for the next 3 days lapucelle, but if you need to vent , go to the other site swhisper1 Jun 2016 #70
This is very boring. The_Casual_Observer Jun 2016 #77
Um..Well she's whooping your "revoluuution" mr sanders. misterhighwasted Jun 2016 #79
Revolution is of and by the people Buzz cook Jun 2016 #80
Just ask the DNC for the TRUTH... nikto Jun 2016 #82
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Sanders: Clinton can't le...»Reply #0