Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
11. Serfs who worked on feudal estates were better off than vagrants who died at the
Sun Jun 10, 2012, 04:19 AM
Jun 2012

hands of outlaws and robbers in the woods.

Indentured servants in the US were better off than slaves.

But neither serfs nor indentured servants had enough income to support a capitalist economy. Because for capitalism to exist, you need consumers with money.

The video presents an obvious economic truth -- that people will pick the highest paying job they can get. Then, with a slick, logical high jump and turn-about it contorts the argument that the employer who pays poverty wages to people who work very hard is perfectly in his rights to sell the products produced at those poverty wages for high prices in other countries and pocket the difference and smart to do so.

The problem with this video is that it forgets the fact that if manufacturing jobs that pay enough for the workers to purchase the products they make are moved to factories in which workers do not earn enough to purchase the products they make, eventually, there will not be enough people with sufficient money to purchase the products -- and then the factories, sweatshops or not, will be closed and the jobs permanently lost.

In fact, that is what is gradually happening all over the world. The Irish, Greek, Spanish and Italian people bought products from Germany and elsewhere. But since the workers in Ireland, Greece, Spain and Italy did not earn enough money in their countries to pay for the products and the money borrowed to permit them to buy the products, the Irish, Greek, Spanish and Italian people are facing austerity measures. They are accused of spending and borrowing more than they were earning. Now they will stop buying the German products, and eventually the hard times that have hit elsewhere will hit Germany and other supposedly prosperous countries.

In time, if this trend continues unabated, the demand for manufactured goods will decline to the point that the world is in an even more serious depression than it is today and even the mining and production of raw materials will be unprofitable.

The makers of this video think in simplistic terms that are beyond belief. Do they think that we are as stupid as they are and cannot see the ultimate result of their economic, hogwash theories?

Yes, workers will seek the highest paying jobs. But unless those jobs pay enough to create a market for the goods they produce, the jobs will not last.

A few sweat shops in a world in which sweat shops are rare will be profitable. But when, as we now see happening around the world, sweat shops become the norm and the employees of those sweat shops are so poorly paid that there is no market for the goods they produce, the economies of the world will gradually shut down. When all manufacturing and most work is paid at sweat-shop rates, we will have a worldwide depression and who knows what that will mean for the political and social future of the world.

Typical right-wing propaganda. I'd like to know how well these people do on tests of reasoning. Not very well, I suspect.

A video in defense of Sweatshops [View all] Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Jun 2012 OP
Why should I feel better because someone else feels worse? nineteen50 Jun 2012 #1
It is a strawman Crow73 Jun 2012 #4
Shocking to find out its Koch funded... Crow73 Jun 2012 #18
I'm gobsmacked. Systematic Chaos Jun 2012 #2
Talk about a right-wing talking point. I personally was not swayed. lookingfortruth Jun 2012 #3
The people who made this video, I hate them. limpyhobbler Jun 2012 #5
Ayn Randian bullshit WhoIsNumberNone Jun 2012 #6
I'd say no matter what her 'standard of living,' her 'quality of life' is very low, then. freshwest Jul 2012 #25
talk about drival gejohnston Jun 2012 #7
Thomas Friedman's best buddy? RufusTFirefly Jun 2012 #8
I have seen the sweatshop in Saipan Left Coast2020 Jun 2012 #9
This advocacy for sweatshops suffers from a lack of imagination Jack Rabbit Jun 2012 #10
Serfs who worked on feudal estates were better off than vagrants who died at the JDPriestly Jun 2012 #11
They don't describe sweatshops as they really are. fasttense Jun 2012 #12
Change Corporate Charters, Unionize Everyone busysaru Jun 2012 #13
Hey buddy in the video, I got one for ya: Quantess Jun 2012 #14
And it would be mutually beneficial: the dumper get rid of his dump and the good ol' .... marble falls Jun 2012 #16
Well said, Quantess! These people are disgusting! nonoxy9 Jul 2012 #27
His first misleading statement about 15 seconds into it ...... marble falls Jun 2012 #15
This is a rip off of the RSAorg videos. secondvariety Jun 2012 #17
This guy's reasoning sulphurdunn Jun 2012 #19
Oh, now I'm so confused. Are sweatshops not evil? I think we can agree on one thing: tclambert Jun 2012 #20
Coming up next... jjewell Jun 2012 #21
Close . . . . HughBeaumont Jul 2012 #24
That video was sort of a whitewash. Quantess Jul 2012 #28
I showed this video to my social worker wife, who made through about 2 minutes . . . . HughBeaumont Jul 2012 #30
"Let's grant for the sake of argument..." chervilant Jun 2012 #22
PASS THE T BAGS! bluedave Jun 2012 #23
If you slant the facts just right you can make a case for just about anything...... wandy Jul 2012 #26
PUKE! burrowowl Jul 2012 #29
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»A video in defense of Swe...»Reply #11