Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
15. What would a drone do to a crowd throwing stones or Molotov cocktails?
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 10:57 AM
Apr 2012

If you are thinking of anarchists, taking pictures won't be of much use because they wear facial coverings.

It would be difficult to target just the person throwing stones or Molotov cocktails in a crowd. The risk of hitting an innocent person who is just exercising his First Amendment rights would be too great -- and would freeze speech as I said.

Further, the fear that drones were there -- just the fear of it -- would chill First Amendment rights.

There are better ways to deal with people throwing stones or Molotov cocktails -- such as effective policing. You want to arrest those people, not kill them on the spot. In order to arrest someone, you have to have a police officer on site with handcuffs. The drones won't help in that effort.

A perception problem? A PERCEPTION PROBLEM?!? annabanana Apr 2012 #1
Itīs just fascinating isnīt it? Lars77 Apr 2012 #2
The Koch brothers might buy it push those nasty protestors away... freshwest Apr 2012 #3
Yep, that's all it is. Now shut up and go home, folks. Or else. freshwest Apr 2012 #4
Calls to mind the adage customerserviceguy Apr 2012 #7
Love the way this guy parses words, getting technical. First they start by experimenting on people freshwest Apr 2012 #5
IIRC, they had this toy in Afghanistan. unhappycamper Apr 2012 #6
Pain compliance on American citizens gets go ahead by court: freshwest Apr 2012 #8
That case is so messed up. cstanleytech Apr 2012 #11
If any human ever perceives a "pain ray", that's a problem of perception saras Apr 2012 #9
This thing violates the human rights to free association, free speech and free assembly. JDPriestly Apr 2012 #10
How can a device not in use violate those rights? Show me where it says it in the constitution that. cstanleytech Apr 2012 #12
This device is intended for crowd control use. JDPriestly Apr 2012 #13
Would you be more supportive if it was restricted to crowds that are resorting to violence though cstanleytech Apr 2012 #14
What would a drone do to a crowd throwing stones or Molotov cocktails? JDPriestly Apr 2012 #15
I thought the discussion was about the heat ray device to disperse crowds? If not cstanleytech Apr 2012 #17
The heat ray device could be used from inside a building to prevent people from coming in the window JDPriestly Apr 2012 #18
headline of the day Enrique Apr 2012 #16
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»US military fights negati...»Reply #15