Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

flpoljunkie

(26,184 posts)
14. As former Justice Stevens said this week to Congress, 'Money is not speech.'
Thu May 1, 2014, 06:16 PM
May 2014
Retired Justice John Paul Stevens tells Congress 'money is not speech'

Daniel Rothberg
April 30, 2014, 1:36 p.m.

Reporting from Washington—

Unlimited campaign expenditures “impair” the democratic process, retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens told senators Wednesday, urging Congress to amend the Constitution to allow “reasonable limits” on election spending.

The Republican-appointed justice, who last testified before the Senate in his 1975 confirmation hearing, stressed the importance of creating a “level playing field” in elections. Stevens offered five points for enacting an amendment to correct what he views as an "error" in campaign finance jurisprudence originating from the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn limits on campaign spending in its 1976 Buckley vs. Valeo ruling.

“While money is used to finance speech, money is not speech,” Stevens said. “After all, campaign funds were used to finance the Watergate burglaries -- actions that clearly were not protected by the First Amendment.”

Stevens, who led the court’s liberal wing, cast campaign finance rules as a nonpartisan issue and said they would allow elected officials to better serve the public. While Stevens did not mention any recent cases by name, the former associate justice criticized Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission, a 2010 decision preventing Congress from restricting independent political expenditures made by corporations and unions. Stevens argued regulations should distinguish between funding from constituents and contributions from corporations or out-of-state donors.

more…

http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/politicsnow/la-pn-supreme-court-stevens-congress-money-speech-20140430,0,4630203.story
Ryan's hearings are the GOP version of how to best eliminate them like mosquitoes, no 1A rights. freshwest May 2014 #1
I love the bubble text! tofuandbeer May 2014 #2
Home run for EarlG! nt brer cat May 2014 #3
...it's criminal. SoapBox May 2014 #4
Like the Republican meeting on contraception without any women progressoid May 2014 #5
True. Just more proof that they really don't care about representation. calimary May 2014 #11
. libodem May 2014 #6
Absolutely FiveGoodMen May 2014 #7
Yes libodem May 2014 #8
Cause... SummerSnow May 2014 #15
Thank you. JDPriestly May 2014 #21
Sounds about right for the 3-hour Marathon Man Blue Owl May 2014 #9
Brought to you by This Week in GOP Outreach (TM) YoungDemCA May 2014 #10
no different from hopemountain May 2014 #12
Why should we be surprised? Remember the panel they had on women's issues, and they didn't MADem May 2014 #13
As former Justice Stevens said this week to Congress, 'Money is not speech.' flpoljunkie May 2014 #14
Love it libodem May 2014 #17
Paul Ryan is a throw back to 1845 dem in texas May 2014 #16
From the "intellectual" who puts out a press release every year and calls it a budget, nyquil_man May 2014 #18
I've said this before and I'll say it again. Ken Burch May 2014 #19
Hey, Eddie Munster czarjak May 2014 #20
Such a tool ... nt TBF May 2014 #22
I believe O'Reilly is a racist. JohnnyRingo May 2014 #23
What a joke Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2014 #24
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Pic Of The Moment: Paul R...»Reply #14