Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Slit Skirt

(1,789 posts)
22. that is correct
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 10:35 AM
Sep 2012

the next time you see a truther you should thank them...at least they had the courage to question the official story. If it wasn't for them we would have had NO investigation of the biggest crime against the US ever. Shit the whole crime scene wasn't even investigated before they shipped that steel to China ASAP

19 guys in a cave thwarting CIA, Pentagon, FBI, Security at the towers, NORAD and a whole other hosts of agencies is somehow "more comfortable and easier" to believe than corruption at the highest levels.

Look what we got from 9/11...The Iraq war, Afghanistan, (military industrial complex happy and rich) Oil (Cheney's energy task force)
and our civil rights slowly being taken away.......I don't know about you...but I smell a coup

..and considering the fact that the US has tried others...Gulf of Tonkin, Northwoods, it is not such a far reach with Cheney at the helm and Bush dumber than shit.

That is exactly why they had to politicize 9/11 and viciously attack any critics... rfranklin Sep 2012 #1
Unfortunately incompetence is not a war crime, But torture and the Iraq invasion are. on point Sep 2012 #2
Willful ignorance should be nt truebluegreen Sep 2012 #4
It's only willful ignorance when Dems are in office. BlueMTexpat Sep 2012 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #13
and heaven05 Sep 2012 #16
Anything that contradicts an ideologue's dogma is discarded Warpy Sep 2012 #54
Weren't "Truthers" telling us about this since, oh, 2002? n/t RoccoR5955 Sep 2012 #3
THANK YOU!!! Slit Skirt Sep 2012 #9
Even now the truth of the Reichstag Fire is unknown..... Jerry442 Sep 2012 #10
No. caseymoz Sep 2012 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #14
That's my understanding of who "truthers" are. caseymoz Sep 2012 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #36
Pearl Harbor was different from 911 caseymoz Sep 2012 #49
the executive was/is a puppet Slit Skirt Sep 2012 #73
yes shanti Sep 2012 #83
The NYT article doesn't prove whether it is incopentence or willful ignorance BlueStreak Sep 2012 #17
It just happens that they couldn't find the briefs caseymoz Sep 2012 #32
The PNACers suggested EXACTLY that BlueStreak Sep 2012 #37
No, NOBODY . . . caseymoz Sep 2012 #48
PNAC = People for a New American Century RoccoR5955 Sep 2012 #65
And on the very morning of 9-11, Donald Rumsfeld BlueStreak Sep 2012 #68
That is not entirely true Slit Skirt Sep 2012 #19
Thank you, slit skirt, for speaking out. I feel the "truth" of 9/11 will come out, truth2power Sep 2012 #25
yes, we must stick together and keep fighting Slit Skirt Sep 2012 #26
A conspiracy in DU to sweep it under a rug? caseymoz Sep 2012 #35
Which conspiracy are you talking about? The official 9/11 narrative presupposes a conspiracy... truth2power Sep 2012 #39
You skipped a part of my post, caseymoz Sep 2012 #42
You seem to be making the definition of conspiracy an issue... truth2power Sep 2012 #74
Count me too. I'm perfectly capable of recognizing wild stuff when I hear it, but I always knew patrice Sep 2012 #30
I stood on a street corner ... Shagman Sep 2012 #31
"stood on a street corner". As did I. Along with two other women. And, yes, people honked truth2power Sep 2012 #41
I'm not condescending. caseymoz Sep 2012 #38
you have it all mixed up... Slit Skirt Sep 2012 #43
I didn't attack, at all. caseymoz Sep 2012 #53
nice try Slit Skirt Sep 2012 #77
"Making wild conjectures before you have the answers based no evidence and weak inferences.... Th1onein Sep 2012 #67
great response! Slit Skirt Sep 2012 #76
The Truth Will Out Th1onein Sep 2012 #93
Thanks for that, I couldn't have said it better. n/t RoccoR5955 Sep 2012 #70
They were COMPLICIT in the attack Th1onein Sep 2012 #29
Absolutely Slit Skirt Sep 2012 #33
The raw steel evidence has been refuted. caseymoz Sep 2012 #40
then don't respond if you don't link it Slit Skirt Sep 2012 #44
Please list the "thousands of engineers" TrogL Sep 2012 #47
I don't have the list of people Slit Skirt Sep 2012 #58
OK, that's engineers who would like it investigated. I'm with them. TrogL Sep 2012 #79
You are becoming a little insulting Slit Skirt Sep 2012 #85
We're looking at the same sites TrogL Sep 2012 #89
welll 1700 of them want a new investigation Slit Skirt Sep 2012 #95
Okie, dokie: Ever heard of the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth? Th1onein Sep 2012 #61
oohh....snap! Slit Skirt Sep 2012 #78
Didn't I just say, I'm not interested in convincing you? caseymoz Sep 2012 #56
opinion is one thing Slit Skirt Sep 2012 #59
Your opinion is squat without something to underpin it. If you are talking about debunking.... Th1onein Sep 2012 #63
Looks like burning embers to me TrogL Sep 2012 #80
Yeah, right. Th1onein Sep 2012 #97
I've not heard it refuted and I've done A LOT of research on this. Particularly looking for Th1onein Sep 2012 #60
As usual, you're awash in undivided middle TrogL Sep 2012 #46
all naysayers are right Slit Skirt Sep 2012 #50
Looks like more than dust to me TrogL Sep 2012 #82
that's all the steel Slit Skirt Sep 2012 #87
I'm seeing more than steel there. TrogL Sep 2012 #90
yeah..ok Slit Skirt Sep 2012 #94
Link to videos? Slit Skirt Sep 2012 #55
Who said I'm accepting the mainstream theory? TrogL Sep 2012 #84
stop right there Slit Skirt Sep 2012 #88
MIHOP has nothing to do with CD TrogL Sep 2012 #91
The towers' collapses defied the laws of physics. Th1onein Sep 2012 #64
FINALLY somebody who agrees that gravity goes down. TrogL Sep 2012 #81
I have a tendency to believe the experts/engineers on things like that. Th1onein Sep 2012 #96
Yup, anyone who even whispered LIHOP or MIHOP was shut down, and the thread sent to the dungeon riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #12
that is correct Slit Skirt Sep 2012 #22
at least barbtries Sep 2012 #15
Yes, that sounds like Clarke. BlueStreak Sep 2012 #18
it sure does. barbtries Sep 2012 #23
I know what you are referring to....it was Gary Hart Slit Skirt Sep 2012 #24
NO, not at all... SkyDaddy7 Sep 2012 #57
Read the "official account," RoccoR5955 Sep 2012 #71
SkyDaddy7...you do not know what you are talking about Slit Skirt Sep 2012 #72
seems more like "selective hearing" KurtNYC Sep 2012 #5
"All right. You've covered your ass now." tanyev Sep 2012 #6
"it was only an assessment of Al Qaeda’s history" rock Sep 2012 #7
Always much suspected. caseymoz Sep 2012 #8
Bush responsible clangsnwhoops Sep 2012 #21
A real must-read jsr Sep 2012 #27
Trying to remember whether the line of questioning during the hearing re 8/6 briefing included any patrice Sep 2012 #28
Conspiracies Jerry442 Sep 2012 #45
Welcome to DU! I've found that whenever anyone derisively states "conspiracy theory," what they.... Raster Sep 2012 #52
Fuck the ny times. They are 11 years too late. In that time through Judy miller and others they still_one Sep 2012 #51
thank you..nice reality check Slit Skirt Sep 2012 #75
Those briefings would make a lovely "October Surprise." toddwv Sep 2012 #62
October Surprise.......I was thinking the same thing, toddwv. Th1onein Sep 2012 #66
An administration that will live in infamy! pscot Sep 2012 #69
Considering some of the responses this post has been getting.... Slit Skirt Sep 2012 #86
Amen!!! TrogL Sep 2012 #92
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The Deafness Before the S...»Reply #22