HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Good Reads (Forum) » What went wrong with Wiki... » Reply #1
In the discussion thread: What went wrong with WikiLeaks [View all]

Response to struggle4progress (Original post)

Tue Sep 4, 2012, 02:18 AM

1. Is your question based upon a "loaded question" fallacy or a "begging the question" fallacy?

 

From Wikipedia:
A loaded question (fallacy) is a question which contains a controversial or unjustified assumption (e.g., a presumption of guilt).

Aside from being a logical fallacy, such questions may be used as a rhetorical tool: the question attempts to limit direct replies to be those that serve the questioner's agenda. The traditional example is the question "Have you stopped beating your wife?" Whether the respondent answers yes or no, he will admit to having a wife, and having beaten her at some time in the past. Thus, these facts are presupposed by the question, and in this case an entrapment, because it narrows the respondent to a single answer, and the fallacy of many questions has been committed. The fallacy relies upon context for its effect: the fact that a question presupposes something does not in itself make the question fallacious. Only when some of these presuppositions are not necessarily agreed to by the person who is asked the question does the argument containing them become fallacious. Hence the same question may be loaded in one context, but not in the other. For example the previous question would not be loaded if it was asked during a trial in which the defendant has already admitted to beating his wife.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question

Begging the question ... is a type of logical fallacy in which a proposition relies on an implicit premise within itself to establish the truth of that same proposition. In other words, it is a statement that refers to its own assertion to prove the assertion. Such arguments are essentially of the form "a is true because a is true" though rarely is such an argument stated as such. Often the premise 'a' is only one of many premises that go into proving that 'a' is true as a conclusion.
...
The fallacy of ... "begging the question" is committed "when a proposition which requires proof is assumed without proof", or more generally denotes when an assumption is used, "in some form of the very proposition to be proved, as a premise from which to deduce it". (The the fallacy) refers to arguing for a conclusion that has already been assumed in the premise, this fallacy consists of "begging" the listener to accept the "question" (proposition) before the labor of logic is undertaken. The fallacy may be committed in various ways.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question


Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 26 replies Author Time Post
struggle4progress Sep 2012 OP
LineReply Is your question based upon a "loaded question" fallacy or a "begging the question" fallacy?
AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #1
jberryhill Sep 2012 #2
AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #3
jberryhill Sep 2012 #4
AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #5
struggle4progress Sep 2012 #6
AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #7
truth2power Sep 2012 #25
jberryhill Sep 2012 #10
AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #12
jberryhill Sep 2012 #13
AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #15
jberryhill Sep 2012 #17
jberryhill Sep 2012 #11
truth2power Sep 2012 #23
fasttense Sep 2012 #8
bemildred Sep 2012 #9
yurbud Sep 2012 #14
struggle4progress Sep 2012 #16
yurbud Sep 2012 #18
struggle4progress Sep 2012 #22
woofwoof01 Sep 2012 #19
unc70 Sep 2012 #20
struggle4progress Sep 2012 #21
truth2power Sep 2012 #24
AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #26
Please login to view edit histories.