Response to BlueinOhio (Reply #10)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 10:30 AM
kristopher (25,205 posts)
14. "safety is only possible in a society that doesn’t rely on nuclear power"
Fukushima Watch: Former PM Kan Sets Out Vision for Nuclear-Free Japan
By Eleanor Warnock
...“After March 11, it’s fair to say I changed my thinking 180 degrees,” he told reporters in Tokyo.
“When I saw that the country was in such a precarious situation, I thought, ‘What is a safe nuclear plant anyway?’ My conclusion was that safety is only possible in a society that doesn’t rely on nuclear power,” the 65-year-old former leader said.
...At what he said was his first formal press conference since resigning, Mr. Kan, wearing a short-sleeved shirt and no tie, maintained a serious demeanor — rarely smiling and pausing to think between his sentences.
...He said that his goal is to get parliament to pass a proposal — drafted by Mr. Kan and other lawmakers — to phase out nuclear power and increase Japan’s share of renewable energy from 10% in 2010 to 38% by 2025.
You can't engineer out the human element.
Fukushima and the Nuclear Pushers
by KARL GROSSMAN
The conclusion of a report of a Japanese parliamentary panel issued last week that the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant disaster was rooted in government-industry “collusion” and thus was “man-made” is mirrored throughout the world. The “regulatory capture” cited by the panel is the pattern among nuclear agencies right up to the International Atomic Energy Agency.
“The Fukushima nuclear power plant accident was the result of collusion between the government, the regulators and Tepco and the lack of governance by said parties,” said the 641-page report of The Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission released on July 5.
In fact, the nuclear regulatory situation in Japan is the rule globally.
In the United States, for example, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and its predecessor agency, the Atomic Energy Commission, never denied a construction or operating license for a nuclear power plant anywhere, anytime. The NRC has been busy in recent times not only giving the go-ahead to new nuclear power plant construction in the U.S. but extending the operating licenses of most of the 104 existing plants from 40 to 60 years—although they were only designed to run for 40 years. That’s because radioactivity embrittles their metal components and degrades other parts after 40 years making the plants unsafe to operate. And the NRC is now considering extending their licenses for 80 years.
Moreover, the NRC’s chairman...
10,000 yen is about $125.
Trouble-prone reactor has rung up far higher tab than initially planned
If the troubled Monju prototype fast breeder reactor project continues, its costs will swell to more than ¥1.4 trillion and its power generation costs will be ¥10,000 per kwh, roughly 1,000 times greater than a regular reactor, according to data compiled by Kyodo News.
Construction of the reactor in Tsuruga, Fukui Prefecture, started in 1985 as part of the government's goal to establish a nuclear fuel cycle to make use of spent nuclear fuel at conventional atomic plants that run on uranium. Monju uses a uranium and plutonium mix known as MOX as fuel.
The facility operated by the government-affiliated Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corp. first reached criticality — where a chain reaction of nuclear fission is sustained — in 1994.
But sodium, used as a coolant, leaked during its test run in December 1995. Around 640 kg of leaked sodium reacted with air and sparked a fire, forcing a prolonged suspension.
The operator was also caught trying to cover the incident up...
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
|Lucky Luciano||Aug 2012||#2|
"safety is only possible in a society that doesn’t rely on nuclear power"
|Jim Lane||Aug 2012||#13|
Please login to view edit histories.