Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
30. The Solicitor General of the US, Donald Verrilli...
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 01:01 AM
Apr 2012

submitted a brief for the Justice Department arguing that such searches didn't violate the 4th Amendment.

The brief filed can be read here:
http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/10-945bsacUnitedStates.pdf

You can see who opposed the searches (filed for/in support of the petitioner ) and who supported them (for/in support of respondent) and their arguments
here: http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/florence-v-board-of-chosen-freeholders-of-the-county-of-burlington/

Note that in the Supreme Court's decision that it's not the mere 'arrest' that allows such a search but placing an arrested person in the 'general population' of the jail.


USA! USA! USA! geardaddy Apr 2012 #1
Conservatives sure seem to love this sort of stuff Hugabear Apr 2012 #2
Evidentally Obama loves it too. avaistheone1 Apr 2012 #9
not over there... alp227 Apr 2012 #23
If they are their for a "minor" offense, why take them to jail at all? Arctic Dave Apr 2012 #3
Exactly. avaistheone1 Apr 2012 #8
No, there is money and statistics to be made from even minor offenses. dixiegrrrrl Apr 2012 #18
When the high court has no problem with waterboarding and torture..... lib2DaBone Apr 2012 #4
While ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2012 #5
"strip searches are really not that bad" Occulus Apr 2012 #10
Yeah ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2012 #11
I had to under go one abolugi Apr 2012 #12
I disagree ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2012 #14
Sorry, I disagree dash_bannon Apr 2012 #19
The Ruling Is A Victory For The Obama Administration... Purveyor Apr 2012 #6
I trust these five were stripped searched to be fair and balanced in their ruling. nt onehandle Apr 2012 #7
Who searched Clarence Thomas, Anita Hill? alp227 Apr 2012 #13
Scalitas once again dances on the grave of the 4th Amendment Rochester Apr 2012 #15
Ugh. Just ugh. a2liberal Apr 2012 #16
The 'conservative wing' of the court are authoritarians. blackspade Apr 2012 #17
Chilling to the bone Politicub Apr 2012 #20
+1 Blue_Tires Apr 2012 #25
The Solicitor General of the US, Donald Verrilli... PoliticAverse Apr 2012 #30
Here is the actual Court Opinion happyslug Apr 2012 #21
This court is out to lunch bigdarryl Apr 2012 #22
Of course... WillParkinson Apr 2012 #26
You can't be "stopped and stripped searched" according to the decision (which was supported by... PoliticAverse Apr 2012 #31
Putting people in prison is what this country does best. sarcasmo Apr 2012 #24
The Facists are winning. Loge23 Apr 2012 #27
does this mean.... unkachuck Apr 2012 #28
It's not a very amusing topic, but the earnestness of your post made me laugh! nt MADem Apr 2012 #29
Fox "News" and hate radio should be screaming about this Doctor_J Apr 2012 #32
Imagine if a conservative replaces Ginsburg? Thrill Apr 2012 #33
Sonograms for all! nt bemildred Apr 2012 #34
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»High court upholds jails'...»Reply #30