Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Obama admin appeals ruling on tobacco health label [View all]DirkGently
(12,151 posts)2. Eh. Unconcerned about tobacco companies' "rights," but the
"smoking is bad for you" nail has been driven firmly into the ground. Then stamped on. Then jumped up and down on. And hit again.
It's great we all agree on something, but this "gruesome label" thing is frankly a little crazy, and seems more like screaming at smokers than educating them. A bit too self-righteous and ugly.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Smoking raises the odds that you will die in misery from a smoking-related disease.
JDPriestly
Mar 2012
#36
Lung function is impacted. The rest helps, but smoking impacts lung function.
uppityperson
Mar 2012
#29
God,if I thought I was going to be around to age 126 I'd put a bullet in my head.
virgogal
Mar 2012
#31
Estimating the impact of different cigarette package warning label policies: The auction method
joshcryer
Mar 2012
#10
Well, it certainly works, the question is whether or not we want this imagry...
joshcryer
Mar 2012
#15
A pack of brand name cigs in MA costs $8.50------NY is worse. $5.00 would be wonderful.
virgogal
Mar 2012
#21
Young ones might be influenced NOT to start smoking by viewing realistic photos..
Tikki
Mar 2012
#33
Am I the only non-smoker here who thinks these labels are dumb and obnoxious?
nomorenomore08
Mar 2012
#40