Reply #58

In the discussion thread: AP source: Israel will keep US out of the loop if it decides to strike Iran’s nuclear program [View all]

Response to Bigmack (Reply #4)

Fri Mar 2, 2012, 08:10 PM

former9thward (6,370 posts)

58. Why are you censoring yourself using terms like "Blank blanks"

Come on use the terms that you really want to. You know you do.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

74 replies	Author	Time	Post
AP source: Israel will keep US out of the loop if it decides to strike Iran’s nuclear program [View all]	villager	Feb 2012	OP
Then the US should tell Israel that there on there own, period. If Russia or China take exception	teddy51	Feb 2012	#1
they're, their.	marybourg	Feb 2012	#15
*aggressive	boppers	Feb 2012	#22
Maybe we should keep Isreal out of the loop of Foreign Aid Money	DontTreadOnMe	Feb 2012	#2
*Israel	boppers	Feb 2012	#23
Good. Keep us out of it altogether.	MrSlayer	Feb 2012	#3
There is only ONE way to stop an Israeli attack	Bigmack	Feb 2012	#4
If the President did that	customerserviceguy	Feb 2012	#10
It sounds like a great idea to me. Israel, if you bomb Iran you are on your own. No money & no help	peacebird	Feb 2012	#28
I doubt that...	ecstatic	Feb 2012	#36
The Jews who are going to vote for Obama will, those who have already decided they will not	nanabugg	Mar 2012	#66
The Jewish vote is not monolithic. AIPAC supporters may leave, though.	Selatius	Mar 2012	#74
While I'm sure that would	leftynyc	Feb 2012	#40
I think that he/she meant "blankety-blanks."	The Stranger	Feb 2012	#43
Any idea	leftynyc	Feb 2012	#45
No	The Stranger	Feb 2012	#49
Maybe they are related to the 'blah' people Santorum talks about? nt	msanthrope	Mar 2012	#71
Why are you censoring yourself using terms like "Blank blanks"	former9thward	Mar 2012	#58
Good. If Israel thinks the threat is worth their blood and treasure, than they should attack.	napoleon_in_rags	Feb 2012	#5
US will stay out for about 3 minutes.	CAPHAVOC	Feb 2012	#7
We'll be drawn into it instantly	customerserviceguy	Feb 2012	#12
"...the usual half measures we take when trying to fight a PC war." ??? Please elaborate.	2ndAmForComputers	Feb 2012	#16
If we go into a war	customerserviceguy	Feb 2012	#18
I see.	2ndAmForComputers	Feb 2012	#20
The vast majority of the wars we've been involved in	customerserviceguy	Feb 2012	#21
Great scene, great movie!	amandabeech	Feb 2012	#35
If you mean WW3, then yes, it CAN be ruled out.	AverageJoe90	Mar 2012	#54
US involvement puts Israel in grave danger.	napoleon_in_rags	Feb 2012	#13
I really like this.	indivisibleman	Feb 2012	#17
A man has to have some poetic license, doesn't he?	napoleon_in_rags	Feb 2012	#19
Ron Paul	SkyDaddy7	Feb 2012	#34
?? He wants to bring all the troops home and mind our own business.	CAPHAVOC	Feb 2012	#42
Not worth it to me!	SkyDaddy7	Mar 2012	#53
Confusing	CAPHAVOC	Mar 2012	#65
Mind my own business? LOL!	SkyDaddy7	Mar 2012	#69
True, but he'll also destroy programs like Social Security, Medicare, public education, etc.	Selatius	Mar 2012	#72
Now that is a true reply... n/t	Tripod	Mar 2012	#63
Let the Israelis do it themselves.	hrmjustin	Feb 2012	#6
lmfao!	Earth_First	Feb 2012	#8
Plausible Deniability is the cat's meow these daze.	99th_Monkey	Feb 2012	#9
Armegeddon	CAPHAVOC	Feb 2012	#11
Apocalypse Too?	99th_Monkey	Feb 2012	#14
Oh, PUH-LEEZE, you two.	AverageJoe90	Mar 2012	#55
Deniability is not plausible, unless you imagine that US intelligence is completely incompetent	FarCenter	Feb 2012	#38
No there is another way to stop Israel	lovuian	Feb 2012	#24
So yea, I guess they did	ProfessionalLeftist	Feb 2012	#25
They Will Time the Attack to Cause Maximum Damage to Obama's Re-election Chances	AndyTiedye	Feb 2012	#26
You are basing this on...?	Behind the Aegis	Feb 2012	#27
Agreed.nt	cstanleytech	Feb 2012	#30
Just like the claims of imminent WW3?(Which is REAL paranoid nonsense, btw.)	AverageJoe90	Mar 2012	#57
He may be no friend but that doesn't amount to conspiracy to affect our elections.	Behind the Aegis	Mar 2012	#60
Ah, perhaps not.	AverageJoe90	Mar 2012	#61
I honestly don't think that Ron Paul would even TRY to stop Israel.	AverageJoe90	Mar 2012	#56
If RP Were the GOP Nominee, Obama Would Have a Lot More Leverage with Israel	AndyTiedye	Mar 2012	#64
Doesnt matter imo as there will still be unreasonable people who bash the US and claim its still	cstanleytech	Feb 2012	#29
I'd like a doughnut please	Brettongarcia	Feb 2012	#32
So would I :(	cstanleytech	Feb 2012	#33
Just think of it as a militarized Super PAC (nt)	muriel_volestrangler	Feb 2012	#31
If they do	atreides1	Feb 2012	#37
Several options	Lurks Often	Feb 2012	#39
Reading threads like this one proves	leftynyc	Feb 2012	#41
I DO NOT think I know EVERYTHING	Bigmack	Feb 2012	#44
I said NOTHING about US involvement	leftynyc	Feb 2012	#46
Iraq is likely to oppose at this point. Its Shia majority has ties to people in Iran.	Selatius	Mar 2012	#73
Cut their fucking military funding already	snooper2	Feb 2012	#47
As long as the US isn't	Centrik	Feb 2012	#48
US warships running at flank speed out of the Persian Gulf	Strelnikov_	Feb 2012	#50
Yum!	RUMMYisFROSTED	Feb 2012	#51
NYT: U.S. Sees Iran Attacks as Likely if Israel Strikes	alp227	Feb 2012	#52
The right wingers in the US are salivating for a war with Iran	Rosa Luxemburg	Mar 2012	#59
Ironic, because many on the right are screaming about an imminent 3rd World War at the same time....	AverageJoe90	Mar 2012	#62
We have to win the election	Rosa Luxemburg	Mar 2012	#68
It just sickens me to hear Graham and the RW-AIPAC cabal talk about what they will	nanabugg	Mar 2012	#67
Will they keep our troops blood out of the loop afterwards also?	Marrah_G	Mar 2012	#70

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.