Reply #15

In the discussion thread: [Climate scientist] Peter Gleick Admits to Deception in Obtaining Heartland Climate Files [View all]

Response to salvorhardin (Original post)

Tue Feb 21, 2012, 05:14 AM

PuffedMica (795 posts)

15. The high cost of exposing the deniers for what they are

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

48 replies	Author	Time	Post
[Climate scientist] Peter Gleick Admits to Deception in Obtaining Heartland Climate Files [View all]	salvorhardin	Feb 2012	OP
so the right can steal and misinterpret climate scientist emails, but when we leak	villager	Feb 2012	#1
Has Heartland admitted any such theft in stealing the emails of hundreds of climate scientists?	DCKit	Feb 2012	#2
There's no story here - not really.	OneAngryDemocrat	Feb 2012	#3
They may ignore the insignificance of his deception, and just call him dishonest.	tclambert	Feb 2012	#17
O Horrors!	Warren Stupidity	Feb 2012	#4
The article doesn't give enough information to determine whether	JDPriestly	Feb 2012	#5
Record highs are outnumbering record lows 3-1	caseymoz	Feb 2012	#10
I'm not questioning that. I am questioning whether there	JDPriestly	Feb 2012	#40
Obtaining information fraudulently would be against the law.	caseymoz	Feb 2012	#42
he claimed to be a board member	reorg	Feb 2012	#46
I also disagree that the allegedly fake document reads like	JDPriestly	Feb 2012	#48
"I'm shocked, shocked to find gambling going on in this establishment!	padruig	Feb 2012	#6
What was the personal grudge Gleick had against Heartland? nt	wtmusic	Feb 2012	#7
Many on BOTH sides of the global warming debate are so flawed, the motives and ethics of BOTH sides	stockholmer	Feb 2012	#8
This post was hidden by jury decision.	caseymoz	Feb 2012	#11
spannered -- try traveling somewhere mate, perhaps to the UK	stockholmer	Feb 2012	#21
Why? To be educated in flash-in-the-pan slang?	caseymoz	Feb 2012	#27
Uhm...	kenfrequed	Feb 2012	#29
nice geographical/cultural reductionism	stockholmer	Feb 2012	#30
Back to the subject . . .	caseymoz	Feb 2012	#33
That's neither odd nor suspicious.	caseymoz	Feb 2012	#32
True	kenfrequed	Feb 2012	#43
Global Warming: 1,000 climate scientists for, 1 oil geologist against = "unsettled"	LastLiberal in PalmSprings	Feb 2012	#13
+infinity	kenfrequed	Feb 2012	#20
"deniers" - lololol, spoken like a true ayatollah, colour me undecided, I know that is 'heretical'	stockholmer	Feb 2012	#24
I imagine that, when lacking a substantive point, we often resort to melodrama.	LanternWaste	Feb 2012	#25
Thank you.	kenfrequed	Feb 2012	#44
at the end of the day, it is not settled, sorry, but I wont play the 'pick on side or another' game	stockholmer	Feb 2012	#23
I feel the same way about the theory of gravity...	LanternWaste	Feb 2012	#26
Definitely!	kenfrequed	Feb 2012	#28
It is actually quite similar to the 1990s early 2000s creationists vs evolution debates.	joshcryer	Feb 2012	#35
no it is fucking settled science. The only reasonable discussions are about	Warren Stupidity	Feb 2012	#37
The science is settled. There is no controversy. Global Climate Change is real.	Ian David	Feb 2012	#18
False equivalency BS	kenfrequed	Feb 2012	#19
"the science is unsettled"? Bollocks.	truebrit71	Feb 2012	#22
LOL	joshcryer	Feb 2012	#34
The only ones for whom this science is unsettled are extreme right-wingers	Hugabear	Feb 2012	#45
This doesn't make climate change data or conclusions untrue	CreekDog	Feb 2012	#9
Remember when climate scientists emails were hacked?	caseymoz	Feb 2012	#12
I don't have a problem with it, and I think he was a fool to apologize	saras	Feb 2012	#14
The high cost of exposing the deniers for what they are	PuffedMica	Feb 2012	#15
The oil industry/Heartland willingly released the information to him	Kolesar	Feb 2012	#16
A poster hits nail on the head (for radical RW in general)	BadgerKid	Feb 2012	#31
What's sad about this, imo, is that he didn't release it to Wikileaks...	joshcryer	Feb 2012	#36
I do not care how the documents were obtained, only that they were obtained. (nt)	w4rma	Feb 2012	#38
Do you care about them being fake?	salvorhardin	Feb 2012	#39
what are you talking about? n/t	reorg	Feb 2012	#47
concern is the answer we were looking for	tiny elvis	Feb 2012	#41

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.