Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Zimmerman will not testify in his own defense [View all]John2
(2,730 posts)people can come on here with a straight face and claim they believe the lies of the defense and then say they think Zimmerman is guilty, has to be questioned. It is none other than providing cover to let someone get away with murder or taking an innocent boys' life. They just as well be guilty of the coverup themselves.
They are essentially saying there is no evidence Zimmerman profiled this boy and pursued him because of it. They are also saying just because they heard Zimmerman saying these punks or asshole, didn't have any animosity or personal feelings toward Trayvon. Anybody believing that bull shit from the defense is just as guilty of the coverup.
Anybody claiming they believe the defense produced evidence Martin circled back and attacked this guy, is also agreeing with a coverup, because the defense didn't produce any evidence to it. They are just ignoring there was no evidence except Zimmerman's words. You can't talk with a straight face, there was evidence, without going along with a coverup. It is not the prosecution's job to disprove evidence that the defense can't even present. The very fact the defense can't even show evidence Martin circled back and jumped Zimmerman speaks for itself.
There is no evidence showing Zimmerman is innocent and Martin is guilty of a crime. There is no evidence showing Martin bought on his own death by just going to the store and walking back home. The guilty party is George Zimmerman. For anybody denying that based on this defense, is agreeing to a coverup and just as guilty of it.
Now I can vote George Zimmerman guilty with no regrets whatsoever and not even think twice about it, because he is guilty. What I cannot do is assist in a coverup, with the evidence already known. So I'm sorry, I do not agree with people claiming there is reasonable doubt George Zimmerman didn't commit murder when he took this boy's life from him.
So this judge is claiming this animation is evidence? I also have a problem with this Root person. Did Zimmerman so called trainer testify to the physical fitness or capabilities of Trayvon Martin? Am I getting this right and it was allowed without any objection from the prosecution or judge? How can someone who has never trained or examined Trayvon Martin testify to his physical fitness or capabilities? Would that best be left up to Trayvon's coaches or own trainer? And did this guy have a physical fitness Degree or something?