Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Ecuador renounces trade benefits from US Congress [View all]Divernan
(15,480 posts)50. Your post does not prove what you claim it does.
The final outcome depends upon how the govt. spends the income - as in relocating, educating, providing medical care for impoverished indigenous peoples.
"In an interview, Ecuador's secretary of hydrocarbons, Andrés Donoso Fabara, accused indigenous leaders of misrepresenting their communities to achieve political goals. "These guys with a political agenda, they are not thinking about development or about fighting against poverty," he said.
Fabara said the government had decided not to open certain blocks of land to bidding because it lacked support from local communities. "We are entitled by law, if we wanted, to go in by force and do some activities even if they are against them," he said. "But that's not our policy."
Fabara said the government had decided not to open certain blocks of land to bidding because it lacked support from local communities. "We are entitled by law, if we wanted, to go in by force and do some activities even if they are against them," he said. "But that's not our policy."
Now let us consider how the US Big Oil companies raped Ecuador's environment and the indigenous populations for decades! Texaco was the primary international oil company exporting oil from the coast of Ecuador. This company managed the oil operation from 1971 to 1992, when it was nationalized by Ecuador.
Texaco's contract for oil production in Ecuador expired in 1992. PetroEcuador then took over 100% of the oil production management. 1.5 billion barrels of crude oil was reported to have been extracted while under the management of Texaco. There were also reports of 19 billion gallons of waste that had been dumped into the natural environment with the absence of any monitoring or overseeing to prevent damages to the surrounding areas. In addition there was a report of 16.8 million gallons of crude that was dispersed into the environment in relation to spillage out of the Trans-Ecuadorian pipeline.
In the early 1990s a lawsuit led by Ecuadorian government officials of 1.5 billion dollars was presented against the Texaco company with claims that there was an immense pollution epidemic that led to the demise of many natural environments as well as an increase in human illnesses.
A cancer study was conducted in 1994 by the Centre for Economic and Social Rights which found a rise in health concerns in the Ecuadorian region. In 2002, it was found that there was a notably higher incidence of cancer in women and men in the countries where there was oil production present for over 20 years. Women also reported increased rates in a copious amount of psychical aliments such as skin mycosis, sore throat, headaches and gastritis. The primary argument against these findings were that they were weak and biased. Texaco decided on jurisdiction in Ecuador.
The case put against Texaco remained in the works for some time. In 2001, Texaco was taken over by Chevron, another oil company, which assumed the liabilities left by the previous production. On February, 2011 Chevron was found guilty after inheriting the case left by Texaco and was said to be required to pay 9 billion dollars in damages. This is known to be one the largest environmental lawsuits award recorded
http://www.counterspill.org/article/ecuador-vs-chevron-texaco-brief-history
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_peoples_in_Ecuador
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Is that why Sandy Levin threatened to block it if Ecuador gave Snowden asylum?
magical thyme
Jun 2013
#21
President Correa has already refused US military bases in Ecuador unless Ecuador can have bases
byeya
Jun 2013
#25
and Sen. Sandy Levin's threat to block it pre-empted Ecuadors pre-emptive pullout.
magical thyme
Jun 2013
#26
I think Ecuadoreans are better off with better paying jobs than selling flowers.
Divernan
Jun 2013
#52
Ecuador: Media is Distorting Our Words on Snowden. We're Pulling Out of US Trade Agreement
Catherina
Jun 2013
#3
Given Correa's brother's interest, and according to the indigenous population,
msanthrope
Jun 2013
#6
To me, 8 million acres of rainforest with hundreds of thousands of endangered
geek tragedy
Jun 2013
#9
The Top Dems who came up with this stupidity must be feeling like real doofuses now n/t
Catherina
Jun 2013
#7
HAH! So much for the US holding it over Equador's head about Snowden! n/t
backscatter712
Jun 2013
#8
Ecuador also offered a multimillion donation for human rights training in the United States
Catherina
Jun 2013
#11
Ecuador owes China $9 billion, and China now owns 20% of Ecuador's land mass--pristine
geek tragedy
Jun 2013
#30
Ask the indigenous peoples in the rain forest that Ecuador just sold to China
geek tragedy
Jun 2013
#31
Denying themselves hundreds of millions in trade benefits will really show the US who is boss
Bacchus4.0
Jun 2013
#20
^ Says a citizen of the Empire, perturbed the coin of the realm nolonger buys loyalty as it once did
Poll_Blind
Jun 2013
#34
Ah yes, the U.S. as abusive spouse- but one with a steady income to share if the abuse is allowed.
Poll_Blind
Jun 2013
#44
Hardly. You care not a lick about Ecuador's well-being, only their subservience.
Poll_Blind
Jun 2013
#46
Yeah, the US doesn't care about it's "Back Yard" going to Chinese influence
Lugal Zaggesi
Jun 2013
#38
Costa Rica, Guatemala, and Paraguay have right governments too. The US doesn't need Ecuador
Bacchus4.0
Jun 2013
#54
Ah yes, I forgot about the rigthwing "Parliamentary Putsch" of Fernando Lugo in Paraguay
Lugal Zaggesi
Jun 2013
#73
Sometimes I really love it when another country flips off the US. We need that
Nanjing to Seoul
Jun 2013
#59
Good. Tell the Us Government to take thie economic extortion and stuff it
Nanjing to Seoul
Jun 2013
#69
It's actually hilarious. Like an obnoxious middle-schooler flipping off the principal,
Nye Bevan
Jun 2013
#86
Ecuadorian business leaders call withdrawal from pact "irresponsible" (Spanish)
Bacchus4.0
Jun 2013
#63
So, where the hell is this big announcement on Snowden Ecuador was supposed to make
railsback
Jun 2013
#71
It never happened and this article was circulating saying there are no plans to halt commerce ties
flamingdem
Jun 2013
#76
aha, meanwhile I'm reading about how China already owns Ecuador and is going in to the rainforest
flamingdem
Jun 2013
#78
Someone should tell the rose sellers currently running a million dollar ad buy for a trade agreement
alcibiades_mystery
Jun 2013
#89