HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Ex-Regulator Says Reactor... » Reply #7
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Response to alp227 (Original post)

Tue Apr 9, 2013, 03:56 AM

7. Interesting take...

Basically, he's saying existing GW-scale reactors are too big NOT to fail (at least in various loss-of-cooling scenarios). I guess whether that makes them "flawed" depends on one's faith in always being able to come up with a way to maintain cooling in an accident, or never to have such accidents in the first place. Obviously at Fukushima such faith proved unwarranted!

His overall recommendation sounds like it could be music to the ears of the small modular reactor crowd. And it's also clear that he's advocating a phaseout and not wholesale immediate shutdowns. I'd certainly prefer to see reactors with newer technology rather than extending licenses out as far as 60 and 80 years.

And of course, that leaves aside the question of whether we can do without nuclear; my last remark is just my gut feeling regarding which of two alternatives for fission I'd prefer. What role fission should play in the overall energy mix is less clear to me.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 11 replies Author Time Post
alp227 Apr 2013 OP
JDPriestly Apr 2013 #1
avaistheone1 Apr 2013 #2
kristopher Apr 2013 #6
cosmicone Apr 2013 #3
JDPriestly Apr 2013 #10
Journeyman Apr 2013 #4
kristopher Apr 2013 #5
LineNew Reply Interesting take...
caraher Apr 2013 #7
Kelvin Mace Apr 2013 #8
Octafish Apr 2013 #9
enough Apr 2013 #11
Please login to view edit histories.