Reply #8

In the discussion thread: Idaho lawmaker: Force all adults into militias to protect gun rights [View all]

Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Wed Feb 27, 2013, 05:34 PM

valerief (35,667 posts)

8. Buh wuh about mah freedumb tah not be milishud? nt

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

45 replies	Author	Time	Post
Idaho lawmaker: Force all adults into militias to protect gun rights [View all]	Judi Lynn	Feb 27	OP
You can't make stupid optional either	DainBramaged	Feb 27	#1
If it's a gay militia	Politicalboi	Feb 27	#2
They already are militia members according to existing state law	slackmaster	Feb 27	#3
Here it is.	ErikJ	Feb 27	#9
Article XIV of their state Constitution sets up a militia obligation of most Idaho citizens.	dairydog91	Feb 27	#11
I am no Constitutional scholar, but . . .I	Brigid	Feb 27	#4
Why not?	dairydog91	Feb 27	#5
I still find it hard to believe . . .	Brigid	Feb 27	#12
Leaving the state would do no good.	former9thward	Feb 28	#35
I dare them . . .	Brigid	Feb 28	#36
If we ever got to the point all adults were being forced into militias...	former9thward	Feb 28	#37
good call	oldandhappy	Feb 27	#6
Why not M4 assault rifles, M240 machineguns, and M136 rocket launchers?	dairydog91	Feb 27	#10
Okay, so to preserve "freedom" everyone must be drafted?	mbperrin	Feb 27	#7
Under Federal Law, all males between the ages of 17 and 45 are already in the Militia	happyslug	Feb 27	#15
Sorry, we're not in the militia. Your own link gives explicit instructions on how that shall be done	mbperrin	Feb 27	#19
Read the PRESENT STATUTE, not the 1792 Militia Act	happyslug	Feb 28	#25
Well	JustAnotherGen	Feb 28	#28
Jeez, Don't Encourage Them.... (nt)	Paladin	Feb 28	#29
n/s	JustAnotherGen	Feb 28	#32
The link was provided in the post - not my idea.	mbperrin	Feb 28	#34
Nothing in any of the laws about free guns.	former9thward	Feb 28	#39
Actually, I don't and wouldn't own a gun or serve in any military capacity.	mbperrin	Mar 1	#42
just like more guns will reduce the number of gun deaths	samsingh	Feb 28	#27
Jody? n/t	actslikeacarrot	Feb 28	#33
Buh wuh about mah freedumb tah not be milishud? nt	valerief	Feb 27	#8
Good idea, take away people's freedom, then arm them to the teeth	Downtown Hound	Feb 27	#13
maybe there'll be a White Dragon Militia group..	rabid_byter	Feb 27	#14
Sounds hilarious!	Quantess	Feb 27	#16
Yet another good reason to repeal the 2nd Amendment	rachel1	Feb 27	#17
What a loon.	Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin	Feb 27	#18
there already is a militia	azureblue	Feb 27	#20
That's stupid. You can't force people into something just because they're citizens.	Pterodactyl	Feb 27	#21
Or if its a vaccine.	DeSwiss	Feb 27	#23
I hear ya, bro.	Pterodactyl	Feb 28	#41
All these frightened little people.....	DeSwiss	Feb 27	#22
LOL! Perfect cartoon! Nails the pro-NRA gun fondler-ideology perfectly.	apocalypsehow	Feb 28	#38
Rice said that there was no issue that was more important to his constituents than gun rights.	Mkap	Feb 28	#24
at least this idea is consistent with the constitution and an admission	samsingh	Feb 28	#26
"An admission" of what, for God's sake?	Paladin	Feb 28	#31
an admission that the Constitution refers to arming militias and does not mean infinite guns for	samsingh	Mar 1	#43
I Agree With Your Interpretation. Too Bad Scalia Doesn't... (nt)	Paladin	Mar 1	#44
he doesn't agree with a lot of moral stuff- see what's he's saying about voting rights	samsingh	Mar 1	#45
I've got to find a way out of this state	libodem	Feb 28	#30
As the 2nd amendment was written as a collective right - the rights of states to have "well	apocalypsehow	Feb 28	#40

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.