Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PatrynXX

(5,668 posts)
7. at least it gave me a starting point to argue from
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 12:48 PM
Feb 2013

First amendment speech tends to be more regulated than the second. Even though police are beating people up for free speech that actually is legal by law. Usually it's Free speech with responsibility. Did find out whoever is marketing Bully to DVD/BluRay is being a bunch of idiots. Both disks say PG-13 Version as if there will be an R rated version. I had this explained to me that actually the movie was eventually rated. 3 WORDS. changed. one Motherfucker and 2 in the background fucks. So technically it's a compromise. But the way they are selling it is it's been tweaked for a younger audience. No it hasn't. It's still for the target audience. Now the Common Sense rating folks are off.. This is a Parent child video. Parent and child must watch together. sticking a rating on it is absurd. Harvey put this out as free speech with responsibility and still got clocked for it. Hence the MPAA rating system is null and void.

So yeah I got off track but showing where there are limits. In free speech we have a rating system.. thats now void. But there's another one to take it's place with more explanation. Can never remember if it was factual or not but there was oh mr white in the Untouchables and he's got a concealed weapon in the court... course he's allowed to carry such a gun and promptly shoots a cop. and kevin costner too. well tries. Course then he flies off a root and crashes thru the roof like it's glass. Which I have no idea what the tops of those things were made of..

is sense starting to prevail? samsingh Feb 2013 #1
Big deal derby378 Feb 2013 #2
Be careful what you wish for, in Ohio..... peace13 Feb 2013 #3
If our public places belong to all of us, what about my right to choose whether I want to be around patrice Feb 2013 #11
This decision is in conflict with the Seventh circuit which ruled just the opposite. former9thward Feb 2013 #4
Illinois residents: Now press Lisa Madigan to appeal to Supreme Court frazzled Feb 2013 #5
I think Illinois will be asked to take one for the gun control team. hack89 Feb 2013 #10
The ruling would be narrow, on the merits of the 7th Circuit decision frazzled Feb 2013 #12
As a matter of principle hack89 Feb 2013 #18
As a matter of principle, I should hope not frazzled Feb 2013 #19
Because we know that cops are the greatest protectors of civil rights hack89 Feb 2013 #20
Trust 'em more than crazy people frazzled Feb 2013 #21
The crazies and the criminals don't bother with concealed carry permits hack89 Feb 2013 #22
Here's what "shall issue" gets you. Heywood J Feb 2013 #25
So tell me hack89 Feb 2013 #26
It depends. Heywood J Feb 2013 #28
Impossible to say with certainty hack89 Feb 2013 #29
No, actually, I don't. Heywood J Mar 2013 #31
Considering how gun violence has been steadily decreasing for 20 years hack89 Mar 2013 #32
"Seem to indicate"? Heywood J Mar 2013 #33
The FBI and the CDC collect statistics on gun violence hack89 Mar 2013 #34
another NRA parrot sigmasix Feb 2013 #27
WELL REGULATED. nt onehandle Feb 2013 #6
Bran Muffins? Remmah2 Feb 2013 #13
at least it gave me a starting point to argue from PatrynXX Feb 2013 #7
While another federal appeals court told Illinois that a concealed carry ban was unconstitutional hack89 Feb 2013 #8
THINK about how CC affects small businesses in our cities! & Youth culture everywhere. nt patrice Feb 2013 #9
I'm sure the career violent criminals who carry illegally are disappointed in this ruling slackmaster Feb 2013 #14
So much for the idea that your "castle" is wherever you happen to be standing Major Nikon Feb 2013 #15
The ruling doesn't preclude states from defining the boundaries of a person's castle as broadly... slackmaster Feb 2013 #16
I don't know that they were precluded before Major Nikon Feb 2013 #17
Kick and Rec for gun fetishists Kingofalldems Feb 2013 #23
It's a shame the Congress has considered it a constitutional right to pack an open AR-15-type weapon indepat Feb 2013 #24
The "right"* to strut through Wal Mart with a pistol perched in their pants has always been a apocalypsehow Feb 2013 #30
Why do you oppose the President and the party platform? hack89 Mar 2013 #35
So "hack89" now supports reinstating the AWB and requiring a gun safety test to buy a gun! Great! apocalypsehow Mar 2013 #36
I could support an AWB I guess - it would have no impact on me hack89 Mar 2013 #37
Why do you oppose the President and the party platform? apocalypsehow Mar 2013 #38
Because he is misguided. Yourself? nt hack89 Mar 2013 #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Federal Appeals Court: Th...»Reply #7