Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Drale

(7,932 posts)

1. Does this throw out the judges ruling that

Reply to struggle4progress (Original post)

Sat Feb 23, 2013, 06:00 PM

Feb 2013

Illinois has 180 days to craft a concealed weapons permit or its every man for himself?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Federal court says concealed gun permits not protected by 2nd Amendment [View all] struggle4progress Feb 2013 OP

Does this throw out the judges ruling that Drale Feb 2013 #1

Obviously not. Why would you think that? AnotherMcIntosh Feb 2013 #8

Because the court ruled Illinois ban on concealed carry unconstitutional Drale Feb 2013 #11

The Court for the 10th Cir did not rule that the "Illinois ban on concealed carry" is constitutional AnotherMcIntosh Feb 2013 #13

The constitution is not an unabigiuos document... reACTIONary Feb 2013 #16

Spel chek iz yur frend. JimDandy Feb 2013 #23

i nedz awl teh freindz i kan git (nt) reACTIONary Feb 2013 #37

LOL n/t JimDandy Feb 2013 #38

different circuit bossy22 Feb 2013 #27

Great start! Proves with a great court, the NRA can forever be defeated permanently graham4anything Feb 2013 #2

Th opposite conclusion has been reached by other circuits ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2013 #18

yep. headed that way. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2013 #21

And one day there will be shortly a good SCOTUS graham4anything Feb 2013 #22

More 1%er adoration... ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2013 #28

The 1% is the NRA. 4million out of 350 million is 1.45 rounded down to 1 graham4anything Feb 2013 #29

Your same "hero" Mike Bloomberg who just vetoed an anti-discrimination bill... LAGC Feb 2013 #30

The Great Equalizer got another pro-NRA candidate to quit this week graham4anything Feb 2013 #31

So anything else he does, no matter how 1% is OK because he is against guns ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2013 #33

Post removed Post removed Feb 2013 #34

Yup. And Scalia, Thomas and Kennedy will all retire in the near future graham4anything Feb 2013 #35

o more and no less than those on DU who support the right-wing PAC known as the NRA... LanternWaste Feb 2013 #39

What part does the 10th Circuit not get about the right to conceal and bear arms? indepat Feb 2013 #3

10th Circuit Court of Appeals is in Denver. Hard Assets Feb 2013 #5

That is not a completely correct title. hack89 Feb 2013 #4

Did you read the article? SecularMotion Feb 2013 #6

OK - but U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has just ruled the opposite hack89 Feb 2013 #9

IIRC the issue in illinois was a bit different bossy22 Feb 2013 #26

Illinois was specifically told that a concealed carry ban was unconsitutional hack89 Feb 2013 #32

you would prefer openly carried arms? bubbayugga Feb 2013 #19

Filed under no shit. Warren Stupidity Feb 2013 #7

So open carry then. AtheistCrusader Feb 2013 #10

Thanks Struggle.. Poor Colorado has had their Cha Feb 2013 #12

This decision echoes Scalia in Heller v. D.C. OldRedneck Feb 2013 #14

What Did Peterson Think "Well Regulated" In The 2nd Amendment Meant DallasNE Feb 2013 #15

Scalia explained all that in Heller primavera Feb 2013 #36

Chip, chip, chip away. onehandle Feb 2013 #17

As usual with legal decisions it is poorly reported. former9thward Feb 2013 #20

The court nowhere indicates that "Peterson would have won his case had he challenged struggle4progress Feb 2013 #24

We differ on the interpretation. former9thward Feb 2013 #25