Reply #12

In the discussion thread: McGinn: SPD ending drone program, returning drones to vendor [View all]

Response to rsmith6621 (Original post)

Thu Feb 7, 2013, 08:16 PM

PSPS (4,282 posts)

12. With their newly-installed string of surveillance cameras, maybe they decided they weren't needed.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

39 replies	Author	Time	Post
McGinn: SPD ending drone program, returning drones to vendor [View all]	rsmith6621	Feb 2013	OP
So if these drones arent armed exactly why were they a bad idea OP?	cstanleytech	Feb 2013	#1
Police Trust	rsmith6621	Feb 2013	#2
How about instead you just toss a link up to a specific article you read?	cstanleytech	Feb 2013	#5
if you can't work teh google	Great Cthulhu	Feb 2013	#8
Oh I can work google just fine, what I cannot do is pretend to guess your viewpoint on	cstanleytech	Feb 2013	#9
Do your homework	PSPS	Feb 2013	#11
Thats "your" opinion and I can respect that but how do you know if that is the same reason	cstanleytech	Feb 2013	#13
This post was hidden by jury decision.	Great Cthulhu	Feb 2013	#17
No, I havent been busted for any of those reasons though judging by your reaction	cstanleytech	Feb 2013	#18
Don't bother to apologize. MIRT has removed the poster from our happy group.	freshwest	Feb 2013	#31
I wouldnt want them either	nauthiz	Feb 2013	#4
"comparing drones to helicopters, it's not the same thing." How do you figure that?	cstanleytech	Feb 2013	#6
Easy	nauthiz	Feb 2013	#7
Those reasons fail.	cstanleytech	Feb 2013	#10
Back at you	nauthiz	Feb 2013	#39
there are some comparisons, i'd hazard a guess	farminator3000	Feb 2013	#23
The article posted by the OP states many of the reasons	suffragette	Feb 2013	#15
Thank you but my post wasnt asking	cstanleytech	Feb 2013	#16
The OP's answer to yo upthread is consistent with the reasons given in the articles	suffragette	Feb 2013	#19
You're wondering? Bullshit. You're challenging the OP's very normal idea that people don't want to	ancianita	Feb 2013	#21
No. I am asking whats the difference of unarmed drones vs manned helicopters.	cstanleytech	Feb 2013	#22
Heh heh. I and my nose really don't have a have to add to my own and others' adequate explanations.	ancianita	Feb 2013	#25
My apologies but do keep in mind please	cstanleytech	Feb 2013	#27
Yes. Of course. But satellites haven't also killed 4,700 people in the last four years, have they.	ancianita	Feb 2013	#28
Ah but these are unarmed drones not the armed ones.	cstanleytech	Feb 2013	#29
Why are you so obsessed with this matter?	Ian Iam	Feb 2013	#30
Sorry to bust your little conspiracy theory but nope.	cstanleytech	Feb 2013	#36
The price of freedom = eternal vigilance. Not worry. Not paranoia. Not fear. Vigilance.	ancianita	Feb 2013	#33
Pst, might wanna let Nasa in on that	cstanleytech	Feb 2013	#34
Maybe if the government hadn't used them the way they had...	Ash_F	Feb 2013	#32
You wont get any argument from me over that.	cstanleytech	Feb 2013	#35
NRA will be upset	Katashi_itto	Feb 2013	#3
With their newly-installed string of surveillance cameras, maybe they decided they weren't needed.	PSPS	Feb 2013	#12
Possible, more likely imo though its a PR issue do to the overuse of armed drones overseas.	cstanleytech	Feb 2013	#14
its PR, stock prices, and boys with toys. or girls with toys	farminator3000	Feb 2013	#24
Do you know if Contego is among the vendors that SPD are returning their drones to?	ancianita	Feb 2013	#26
I forgot the right link in that previous post	farminator3000	Feb 2013	#37
Thank you, much appreciated!	ancianita	Feb 2013	#38
K&R!	Fire Walk With Me	Feb 2013	#20

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.