Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Richard III dig: DNA confirms bones are king [View all]Drale
(7,932 posts)76. Now the Queen needs to allow testing to be done on the Two Princes in the Tower
Edward V and Richard, Duke of York and maybe we can figure out who killed them, if indeed those are their bones. Was it Richard or was it Henry VII after Richard died at the Battle of Bosworth Field? Thats something I would like to know.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And this man has been alive 600 years to present a documentary about the time ...
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2013
#3
It had to be a purely female descent, to use thr mitochondrial DNA
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2013
#83
The founder of the Tudor dynasty was Henry Tudor aka Earl of Richmond aka Henry VII.
sarge43
Feb 2013
#19
After Richard had Elizabeth's two young brothers murderd so he could claim
Sheldon Cooper
Feb 2013
#22
I'm apparently descended from Henry VII. Guess he wasn't such a great guy........
kestrel91316
Feb 2013
#61
The Earl of Richmond's granddaughter could close down the theaters with one word.
sarge43
Feb 2013
#18
I hope a copy of his skull is made before burial so his visage can be restored.
mgc1961
Feb 2013
#32
They've done a reconstruction for the TV programme that has just started in the UK
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2013
#62
Sheesh, you get here late and all the good jokes have already been taken. ;-) n/t
eggplant
Feb 2013
#34