http://www.democraticunderground.com/122813650
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 08:49 AM
bananas (19,350 posts)
Proliferation Warnings On Nuclear 'Wonder-Fuel', Thorium
There's been a lot of anti-science hype about Thorium as a nuclear fuel.
Nature recently ran an article debunking some of the hype regarding it's proliferation risks.
Here are two news stories about it, the second one has some good comments by Thierry Dujardin, deputy director for science and development of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Nuclear Energy Agency.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/12/121205132246.htm
Proliferation Warnings On Nuclear 'Wonder-Fuel', Thorium
Dec. 5, 2012 — Thorium is being touted as an ideal fuel for a new generation of nuclear power plants, but in a piece in this week's Nature, researchers suggest it may not be as benign as portrayed.
The element thorium, which many regard as a potential nuclear "wonder-fuel," could be a greater proliferation threat than previously thought, scientists have warned.
<snip>
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/nuclear/is-the-superfuel-thorium-risker-than-we-thought-14821644
Is the "Superfuel" Thorium Risker Than We Thought?
A new study in Nature says that using thorium as a nuclear fuel has a higher risk for proliferation into weapons than scientists had believed.
By Phil McKenna
December 5, 2012 2:05 PM
Imagine a cheap, plentiful source of energy that could provide safe, emissions-free power for hundreds of years without refueling and without any risk of nuclear proliferation. The fuel is thorium, and it has been trumpeted by proponents as a "superfuel" that eludes many of the pitfalls of today’s nuclear energy. But now, as a number of countries including China, India, and the United States explore the potential use of thorium for nuclear power, researchers say one of the biggest claims made about the fuel—its proliferation resistance—doesn’t add up.
<snip>
However, Dujardin says, a number of advanced reactor designs, including molten salt reactors, provide similar benefits and can use existing uranium-based fuel. And for cost reasons alone, Dujardin says it may be better to continue developing next-generation reactor designs using existing uranium fuel technology.
"When a technology is in some difficulty, and nuclear technology has been shocked by the Fukushima accident in Japan, people search for a magic solution, but there is no silver bullet," he says. "The difference in the state of development of thorium versus other sources of fuel is so vast and the cost of developing the technology is so high, it’s really questionable today whether it’s worthwhile to spend a lot of money on the development of thorium."
<snip>
= new reply since forum marked as read
