Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: France fears Islamist rise in Syria unless opposition helped [View all]leveymg
(36,418 posts)5. More on the Gulf/western governments propaganda machine that shapes public opinion on Syria
Here's a critical report from a year ago that described how western opinion about early events was shaped by exile media: http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/01/06/the-neocon-propaganda-machine-pushing-%E2%80%9Cregime-change%E2%80%9D-in-syria/
Of the three main sources for all data on numbers of protesters killed and numbers of people attending demonstrations the pillars of the narrative all are part of the regime change alliance.
The Syrian Observatory of Human Rights, in particular, is reportedly funded through a Dubai-based fund with pooled (and therefore deniable) Western-Gulf money (Saudi Arabia alone has, according to Elliot Abrams allocated US$130 billion to palliate the masses of the Arab Spring).
What appears to be a nondescript British-based organization, the Observatory has been pivotal in sustaining the claims of the mass killing of thousands of peaceful protesters using inflated figures, facts, and often exaggerated claims of massacres and even recently genocide.
Although it claims to be based in its directors house, the Observatory has been described as the front office of a large media propaganda set-up run by the Syrian opposition and its backers. The Russian Foreign Ministry stated starkly:
It receives its information, it says, from a network of activists inside Syria; its English-language website is a single page with al-Jazeera instead hosting a minute-by-minute live blog page for it since the outset of protests.
The second, the (Local Co-ordination Committees) LCCs, are a more overt part of the oppositions media infrastructure, and their figures and reporting is similarly encompassed only [16] within the context of this main narrative: in an analysis of their daily reports, I couldnt find a single reference to any armed insurgents being killed: reported deaths are of martyrs, defector soldiers, people killed in peaceful demonstrations and similar descriptions.
The third is al-Jazeera, whose biased role in reporting the Awakenings has been well documented. Described by one seasoned media analyst as the sophisticated mouthpiece of the state of Qatar and its ambitious emir, al-Jazeera is integral to Qatars foreign-policy aspirations.
Al-Jazeera has, and continues, to provide technical support, equipment, hosting and credibility to Syrian opposition activists and organizations. Reports show that as early as March 2011, al-Jazeera was providing messaging and technical support to exiled Syrian opposition activists , who even by January 2010 were co-ordinating their messaging activities from Doha.
The Syrian Observatory of Human Rights, in particular, is reportedly funded through a Dubai-based fund with pooled (and therefore deniable) Western-Gulf money (Saudi Arabia alone has, according to Elliot Abrams allocated US$130 billion to palliate the masses of the Arab Spring).
What appears to be a nondescript British-based organization, the Observatory has been pivotal in sustaining the claims of the mass killing of thousands of peaceful protesters using inflated figures, facts, and often exaggerated claims of massacres and even recently genocide.
Although it claims to be based in its directors house, the Observatory has been described as the front office of a large media propaganda set-up run by the Syrian opposition and its backers. The Russian Foreign Ministry stated starkly:
The agenda of the [Syrian] transitional council [is] composed in London by the Syrian Observatory of Human Rights It is also there where pictures of horror in Syria are made to stir up hatred towards Assads regime.The Observatory is not legally registered either as a company or charity in the United Kingdom, but operates informally; it has no office, no staff and its director is reportedly awash with funding.
It receives its information, it says, from a network of activists inside Syria; its English-language website is a single page with al-Jazeera instead hosting a minute-by-minute live blog page for it since the outset of protests.
The second, the (Local Co-ordination Committees) LCCs, are a more overt part of the oppositions media infrastructure, and their figures and reporting is similarly encompassed only [16] within the context of this main narrative: in an analysis of their daily reports, I couldnt find a single reference to any armed insurgents being killed: reported deaths are of martyrs, defector soldiers, people killed in peaceful demonstrations and similar descriptions.
The third is al-Jazeera, whose biased role in reporting the Awakenings has been well documented. Described by one seasoned media analyst as the sophisticated mouthpiece of the state of Qatar and its ambitious emir, al-Jazeera is integral to Qatars foreign-policy aspirations.
Al-Jazeera has, and continues, to provide technical support, equipment, hosting and credibility to Syrian opposition activists and organizations. Reports show that as early as March 2011, al-Jazeera was providing messaging and technical support to exiled Syrian opposition activists , who even by January 2010 were co-ordinating their messaging activities from Doha.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
16 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
France fears Islamist rise in Syria unless opposition helped [View all]
UnrepentantLiberal
Jan 2013
OP
oh come on, it's long been clear that a major part of the rebels are "islamists"
NoMoreWarNow
Jan 2013
#1
Juan Cole: Islamists are 'very minor in the revolution a a whole, representing a small percentage ..
pampango
Jan 2013
#4
Foreign Jihadis are acknowledged to be the "most effective" part of the Syrian armed opposition.
leveymg
Jan 2013
#6
"Most effective", "highly effective" - certainly true. The only Syrians who are 'effective' fighters
pampango
Jan 2013
#8
Foreign fighter influx rose sharply in early summer when Army defections slowed to a trickle.
leveymg
Jan 2013
#9
I agree. As the rate of defections has declined and fewer civilians join, the supply of fighters
pampango
Jan 2013
#10
The winners of the religious civil war in Syria are 1) al-Qaeda, 2) Israel, 3) KSA
leveymg
Jan 2013
#11
An al-Qaeda 'safe haven' in Syria will also put them adjacent to Israel which has to cause some
pampango
Jan 2013
#14
We know who the "winners" are, as well the victims are clearly the Syrian people,
leveymg
Jan 2013
#15
Islamicists wouldn't be a problem in Syria if France (and the US) hadn't "helped" there and in Libya
leveymg
Jan 2013
#3