Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,018 posts)
19. No they couldn't.
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 08:29 PM
Jan 2013
The Republicans listed a series of amendments to cut spending, which they labeled "pork," and to toughen some of the bill's criminal provisions as measures they would press if the point of order survived a challenge.

Once the tactic failed, it was clear that Republicans could not maintain a filibuster, which also takes 60 votes to halt, although Senator Bob Dole of Kansas, the minority leader, said he was not sure how long they would persist.


(http://www.nytimes.com/1994/08/26/us/decision-senate-overview-crime-bill-approved-61-38-but-senate-going-home-without.html?pagewanted=all" target="_blank">NY Times, 8/26/94)

According to the official roll call vote, 61 senators voted yea, essentially rendering any filibuster attempt worthless.

The two Dems who voted nay: Richard Shelby (who later became a Republican) and Russ Feingold.

The Republicans who voted yea: Lincoln Chafee (who became an independent in 2010 or 2011), William Cohen, John Danforth, Jim Jeffords (who became independent in 2001 or so), Nancy Kassebaum, Bill Roth, and Arlen Specter.
I'm curious. nick of time Jan 2013 #1
Sanity needs to start somewhere, Thank You Diane Feinstein for taking a stand. Thinkingabout Jan 2013 #3
While I agree that sanity needs to start somewhere, nick of time Jan 2013 #4
I did agree there was probably not enough votes and I added sanity needs to start. Thinkingabout Jan 2013 #13
Agree 100%. nick of time Jan 2013 #14
Did Republicans filibuster the 1994 ban? Ter Jan 2013 #16
No they couldn't. alp227 Jan 2013 #19
I don't like the idea of having armed guards in schools but we must admit the mass killings Thinkingabout Jan 2013 #2
Well, if Harry promised it, then rateyes Jan 2013 #5
Just like he promised tough filibuster reform. nick of time Jan 2013 #6
It's a joke SHRED Jan 2013 #7
That's what I just thought. Third Doctor Jan 2013 #8
That's a good word for it SHRED Jan 2013 #9
I wonder if that was the quid pro quo? nick of time Jan 2013 #10
Feinstein opposed the talking filibuster... SHRED Jan 2013 #11
I couldn't agree more. nick of time Jan 2013 #12
Dems have a majority, now, but... reACTIONary Jan 2013 #17
i hope so samsingh Jan 2013 #15
She has support for a ban on protruding pistol grips on rifles and shotguns. krispos42 Jan 2013 #18
Well, that's sure to stop crime! NickB79 Jan 2013 #20
M-14 is two less than M-16, so it must be less powerful JustABozoOnThisBus Jan 2013 #23
Support, yes. Enough support, probably not. Adam-Bomb Jan 2013 #21
Meaningless Crepuscular Jan 2013 #22
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Democratic Senator (Feins...»Reply #19