Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,974 posts)
17. We can thank the cigarette industry for the unhealthy fire retardants
Mon Jan 21, 2013, 05:56 PM
Jan 2013

in our furniture. They pushed for it rather than developing self-extinguishing cigarettes.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/20/opinion/sunday/kristof-are-you-safe-on-that-sofa.html

For years, I’ve written about this type of chemical, endocrine disruptors, but The Chicago Tribune has just published a devastating investigative series called “Playing With Fire” that breaks vast new ground. It is superb journalism.

It turns out that our furniture first became full of flame retardants because of the tobacco industry, according to internal cigarette company documents examined by The Tribune. A generation ago, tobacco companies were facing growing pressure to produce fire-safe cigarettes, because so many house fires started with smoldering cigarettes. So tobacco companies mounted a surreptitious campaign for flame retardant furniture, rather than safe cigarettes, as the best way to reduce house fires.

The documents show that cigarette lobbyists secretly organized the National Association of State Fire Marshals and then guided its agenda so that it pushed for flame retardants in furniture. The fire marshals seem to have been well intentioned, but utterly manipulated.

Thousands of chemicals pose risks to health [View all] proverbialwisdom Jan 2013 OP
If you'd like to change your own exposure... hedgehog Jan 2013 #1
I love that website! onestepforward Jan 2013 #3
The flipside is that the flame retardant on our couch... derby378 Jan 2013 #2
Wow, definitely makes one have to weigh the pros and cons siligut Jan 2013 #8
I appreciate the sentiment, but... derby378 Jan 2013 #10
Sorry, didn't know siligut Jan 2013 #14
No problem at all derby378 Jan 2013 #15
The real problem is that U.S. law does not require proof that chemicals are safe. athena Jan 2013 #11
What set her couch on fire? A cigarette, right? What we need is self-extinguishing pnwmom Jan 2013 #13
I'm afraid you're right derby378 Jan 2013 #16
It was easy to guess because that's by far the most typical situation. pnwmom Jan 2013 #18
We already have them. JoeyT Jan 2013 #24
So we're all stuck with the fire retardants in our couches pnwmom Jan 2013 #25
Bookmarked for future reference. JDPriestly Jan 2013 #4
K&R DeSwiss Jan 2013 #5
This documentary is the first thing I thought of while reading the OP u4ic Jan 2013 #22
De nada. DeSwiss Jan 2013 #23
K&R They_Live Jan 2013 #6
It's alarming -- and overwhelming. Thanks for this. gateley Jan 2013 #7
When we voiced concern about this in the 80s we were written off siligut Jan 2013 #9
The Hundred year old lie - Better living through chemistry angrycaveman Jan 2013 #12
We can thank the cigarette industry for the unhealthy fire retardants pnwmom Jan 2013 #17
Did they also push for fire retardants in infant and toddler PJs? Igel Jan 2013 #19
I know they pushed for fire retardants in furniture. pnwmom Jan 2013 #20
USA ...number one in the world for cancer. "...Better Living Through Chemistry". n/t L0oniX Jan 2013 #21
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Thousands of chemicals po...»Reply #17