Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: President Obama Enlists Public to Urge Congress to Act Against Gun Violence [View all]farminator3000
(2,117 posts)you state these 'truths' as if you were there when it went down.
the terminology that you are nitpicking about actually mattering is the red herring-
i'd be fine with calling them "rambo-style fudpuckers".
all the hoohah about the 2nd amendment is just plain silly- there are more guns than people or cars.
everyone who wants a gun has one, i think. all the nra does is sell more gunz, period.
the issue is you don't need a military gun designed to kill the most people from far away to defend yourself.
back to machine guns- there are 15,000 in AZ- even though the laws against machine guns could be stronger, they still aren't used by psychos because they are regulated.
you can't regulate all semi-autos- there are 100s of millions of handguns of that type.
you can regulate detachable mags as a 'military' feature- there are millions of guns that have built in chambers for hunters and such
you could use 8 as a number of rounds.
the feds have to be involved, the states obviously can't get their s together:
http://swampland.time.com/2013/01/17/states-take-action/
***
But the research on actual gunfights, the kind that happen not in a politicians head but in fluorescent-lit stairwells and strip-mall restaurants around America, reveals something surprising. Winning a gunfight without shooting innocent people typically requires realistic, expensive training and a special kind of person, a fact that has been strangely absent in all the back-and-forth about assault-weapon bans and the Second Amendment.
http://swampland.time.com/2013/01/16/your-brain-in-a-shootout-guns-fear-and-flawed-instincts/