Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
28. RE: "Trey Gowdy"..."Hoping for a Senate Seat, the Friendliest of Rivals" (SC Newspaper)
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 09:32 PM
Jan 2013

Hoping for a Senate Seat, the Friendliest of Rivals

Stephen Crowley/The New York Times

Representatives Trey Gowdy, left, and Tim Scott, Republican freshmen, each say the other is the better choice for appointment to replace Senator Jim DeMint.
By JENNIFER STEINHAUER

WASHINGTON — Representatives Trey Gowdy and Tim Scott, first-term Republicans from South Carolina, are both in the running to replace Senator Jim DeMint when the conservative leaves office next month. But they say they know the best man for the job: the other guy.

“If you were to select the best senator to represent a state with a history as rich but provocative as ours,” Mr. Gowdy said, “you would construct Tim Scott.”

Mr. Scott begs to differ. “I honestly feel that Trey would be an amazing senator,” he said. When you are being considered for such a seat, “most people who call you want you to get the job so they can have yours,” he said. “The two exceptions were my mom and Trey.”

Mr. DeMint’s surprise retirement announcement last week — he will become the head of the conservative Heritage Foundation in January — has left Gov. Nikki Haley in the delicious spot of choosing a replacement who would fill out the next two years of his term and then presumably run to defend the seat in 2014.

Mr. Gowdy and Mr. Scott are on the short list of contenders, which also includes Jenny Sanford, the ex-wife of former Gov. Mark Sanford, who infamously disappeared for almost a week in 2009 to visit his mistress in Argentina; Catherine Templeton, a lawyer who runs the state’s Department of Health and Environmental Control; and Henry McMaster, a former state attorney general.


http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/14/us/politics/trey-gowdy-and-tim-scott-senate-aspirants-and-friendliest-of-rivals.html?_r=0

Bizarre Key Paragraphs: KoKo Jan 2013 #1
I'm not sure what is confusing there. A GOPer wrote the 'new' bill. Tx4obama Jan 2013 #2
No Cosmocat Jan 2013 #4
Once again the lame stream media creates a non-issue issue. politicaljunkie41910 Jan 2013 #23
Your argument makes some sense about why SC's Trey Gowdy KoKo Jan 2013 #27
RE: "Trey Gowdy"..."Hoping for a Senate Seat, the Friendliest of Rivals" (SC Newspaper) KoKo Jan 2013 #28
I think this is the right move. NYC Liberal Jan 2013 #3
me too - ALL our presidents should be covered for life. Justitia Jan 2013 #13
Agreed as well. Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #26
After taking out OBL Obama definitely needs lifetime protection. truthisfreedom Jan 2013 #5
I think President Obama will need it ... redstatebluegirl Jan 2013 #6
Well, that's more than the Roman Emperors ever got Demeter Jan 2013 #7
Diocletian did. He stayed retired when the Empire went to shit too. LeftyMom Jan 2013 #15
Depends on how you define retire. nt cstanleytech Jan 2013 #20
He'll need it. ancianita Jan 2013 #8
Correction: Obama *restored* Secret Service protection. arcane1 Jan 2013 #9
yep, typical sensationalist corporate media, alp227 Jan 2013 #10
A list of the bill's co/sponsors - from The House website Tx4obama Jan 2013 #11
This is a good thing Skyline Jan 2013 #12
The cost to the taxpayer? blueclown Jan 2013 #14
Presidents have had 'life-time' protection since 1965 Tx4obama Jan 2013 #16
Yes, it seems that these laws are passed when tragedy strikes. Beacool Jan 2013 #22
I don't think it's about affording it. RudynJack Jan 2013 #24
Oh, I agree. Beacool Jan 2013 #31
It's a damn shame they didn't exempt GW davidpdx Jan 2013 #17
On the other hand, as someone else mentioned, NYC Liberal Jan 2013 #18
President Obama gets Secret Service protection for life skeewee08 Jan 2013 #19
The 90s law was a bad idea in the first place. Beacool Jan 2013 #21
"Drinkie McDumbass? This is THE President. You're welcome!" bullwinkle428 Jan 2013 #25
Well, if there is one President who really really REALLY needs it, it's this one. 2ndAmForComputers Jan 2013 #29
I have NO problem with this! Larrymoe Curlyshemp Jan 2013 #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Obama signs bill, gets Se...»Reply #28