Reply #1

In the discussion thread: Biden cites broad agreement on ‘universal background checks’ for gun buyers [View all]

Thu Jan 10, 2013, 02:33 PM

dsc (39,391 posts)

1. there is another problem with the backround check

there is a limited amount of time to conduct it, and once that time is up, if nothing disqualifying is found the gun has to be sold. This means places that haven't computerized records end up not being able to be searched in time.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

41 replies	Author	Time	Post
Biden cites broad agreement on ‘universal background checks’ for gun buyers [View all]	Recursion	Jan 2013	OP
there is another problem with the backround check	dsc	Jan 2013	#1
So we fix that	Recursion	Jan 2013	#2
I presume that is what Biden is saying	dsc	Jan 2013	#3
Nope... an FFL can still deny the transaction...	-..__...	Jan 2013	#9
OTH it make take weeks to complete a check under the new, yet to be written procedures. One example	jody	Jan 2013	#23
frankly I don't have any problem, nor do I consider it abuse, for	dsc	Jan 2013	#24
Alot has been said about mental illness	question everything	Jan 2013	#4
Mass random shootings start discussions, but are probably bad drivers of policy	Recursion	Jan 2013	#5
Or the fact that people can steal guns from otherwise legal and registered owners	Puzzledtraveller	Jan 2013	#31
Even bolt action rifles can fire several times in a few seconds.	Ashgrey77	Jan 2013	#6
As far as the assault weapons	Recursion	Jan 2013	#8
How they look is one of the very problems that needs to be addressed.	RC	Jan 2013	#27
I'm sorry, background checks and "improved mental health" is just window dressing	DryRain	Jan 2013	#7
Windsor also has much less inequality. MUCH less	Recursion	Jan 2013	#10
I'm sorry, immigration in Canada? THAT's the problem in the USA?	DryRain	Jan 2013	#13
The only difference in gun availability is that a Candian PAL takes a week as opposed to the 3-day	Recursion	Jan 2013	#14
PAL's have very rigid restrictions Americans don't face	DryRain	Jan 2013	#16
Does Windsor have gang infested ghettos? nt	hack89	Jan 2013	#12
Are you asking a rhetorical question?	DryRain	Jan 2013	#17
So they can smuggle drugs by the pallet load but not guns?	hack89	Jan 2013	#18
The Windsor, Ontario drug probem pales in comparison to Detroit	DryRain	Jan 2013	#21
Exactly - the solution to gun violence is a just society	hack89	Jan 2013	#22
No private transfers means police can track down straw purchasers	AtheistCrusader	Jan 2013	#20
there is a lot of support out there	samsingh	Jan 2013	#11
I like this one.	Kingofalldems	Jan 2013	#15
It's a correct use of language though.	AtheistCrusader	Jan 2013	#19
Private transfer is a huge loophole.	groundloop	Jan 2013	#25
There's a solution to that: one year in jail unless...	DryRain	Jan 2013	#26
Why do you only want the 1% to have guns?	AtheistCrusader	Jan 2013	#29
I don't ! I want 1% to have the rights to	DryRain	Jan 2013	#32
Have you ever heard of a Poll Tax?	AtheistCrusader	Jan 2013	#33
I used to pay one, Yes! I heard of it	DryRain	Jan 2013	#34
Artificial cost has nothing to do with 'well regulated'.	AtheistCrusader	Jan 2013	#36
Please stop making stuff up	DryRain	Jan 2013	#39
Never read District of Colubmia vs Heller (2008) huh?	AtheistCrusader	Jan 2013	#40
A 'loophole' suggests an unintended usage.	AtheistCrusader	Jan 2013	#28
True. Or it could simply suggest a means to circumvent regulations....	groundloop	Jan 2013	#37
No private transfers would go a long way to ending straw purchases	AtheistCrusader	Jan 2013	#38
Which wouldnt have stopped Newtown, Ct n/t.	Puzzledtraveller	Jan 2013	#30
No. Mass shootings are generally bad drivers for policy	Recursion	Jan 2013	#35
Would This Open Up The Data Bases?	Macoy51	Jan 2013	#41

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.