Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(44,973 posts)

14. Exactly. Apparently it's perfectly legal for him to have weapons despite charges.

Wed Jan 9, 2013, 11:22 PM

Jan 2013

This articles describes charges against him.

"According to state records, Archuleta had three previous charges for weapons offenses, including a prohibited use of a weapon in Federal Heights in 2004 and carrying a concealed weapon in Denver in June."
http://www.reporterherald.com/news/loveland-local-news/ci_22316955/police-surround-aurora-home-after-man-fires-shots

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Guns in Aurora triple murder purchased legally [View all] El Supremo Jan 2013 OP

The NRA would argue... Squaredeal Jan 2013 #1

Legally purchased guns are a threat to national security... onehandle Jan 2013 #2

It's a problem Recursion Jan 2013 #3

I don't know, maybe reduce the number of guns? upaloopa Jan 2013 #4

I'm a fan of strict liability, as well as licensing Recursion Jan 2013 #7

"worth a shot" lol Gore1FL Jan 2013 #12

Possible. Igel Jan 2013 #13

I'm down with trying. Recursion Jan 2013 #16

Who is Goldman and Lloyd Blankfein? Archae Jan 2013 #9

Welcome, Cynicus Americus Mimosa Jan 2013 #10

hi Wayne LaPierre Enrique Jan 2013 #15

This despite him having a criminal history brentspeak Jan 2013 #11