Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MightyMopar

(735 posts)
9. Odd, given the history of the "assault rifle"
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 06:19 PM
Jan 2013

Definition

The term assault rifle is a translation of the German word Sturmgewehr (literally "storm rifle", "storm" as in "military attack&quot . The name was coined by Adolf Hitler[3] as a new name for the Maschinenpistole 43,[nb 1] subsequently known as the Sturmgewehr 44, the firearm generally considered the first assault rifle that served to popularise the concept and form the basis for today's modern assault rifles.

The translation assault rifle gradually became the common term for similar firearms sharing the same technical definition as the StG 44. In a strict definition, a firearm must have at least the following characteristics to be considered an assault rifle:[4][5][6]

It must be an individual weapon with provision to fire from the shoulder (i.e. a buttstock);
It must be capable of selective fire;
It must have an intermediate-power cartridge: more power than a pistol but less than a standard rifle or battle rifle;
Its ammunition must be supplied from a detachable magazine rather than a feed-belt.
And it should at least have a firing range of 300 meters (1000 feet)

Rifles that meet most of these criteria, but not all, are technically not assault rifles despite frequently being considered as such. For example, semi-automatic-only rifles like the AR-15 (which the M16 rifle is based on) that share parts or design characteristics with assault rifles are not assault rifles, as they are not capable of switching to automatic fire and thus are not selective fire capable. Belt-fed weapons or rifles with fixed magazines are likewise not assault rifles because they do not have detachable box magazines.

The term "assault rifle" is often more loosely used for commercial or political reasons to include other types of arms, particularly arms that fall under a strict definition of the battle rifle, or semi-automatic variant of military rifles such as AR-15s.

The US Army defines assault rifles as "short, compact, selective-fire weapons that fire a cartridge intermediate in power between submachinegun and rifle cartridges."[7]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_rifle

I guess they're not familiar with the "Hitler Rule." Thegonagle Jan 2013 #1
You are referring to a corollary of... Gore1FL Jan 2013 #17
That's the one! Thegonagle Jan 2013 #18
Anyone want to bet that AsahinaKimi Jan 2013 #2
Yea, sleeping with his boy friend’ in the janitor’s closet. And he's homophobic to boot..N/T busterbrown Jan 2013 #5
Drudge is a fucking idiot. Zoeisright Jan 2013 #3
Comparisons of GWB to Hitler were rife, and rarely challenged. Flatulo Jan 2013 #4
Calling a spade a spade is perfectly fine adieu Jan 2013 #6
Sorry, but I believe that equating Bush (or Cheney) to Hitler does a disservice to the Flatulo Jan 2013 #8
Agree. Richardo Jan 2013 #13
Comparison made by well-respected, popular left-leaning blog...? LanternWaste Jan 2013 #14
The PukeBaggers ALWAYS resort to using "Nazi" and "Hitler", when they nothing else. SoapBox Jan 2013 #7
Odd, given the history of the "assault rifle" MightyMopar Jan 2013 #9
We on the left aren't entirely averse with the "... apologist" lable. TheMadMonk Jan 2013 #11
wanna know what makes me think of nazis? armed guards in schools phantom power Jan 2013 #10
Matt Drudge is a hat. Mr.Bill Jan 2013 #12
Clearly gun drudges are going to be the first Luschnig Jan 2013 #15
The other one that hit my eyes a couple times this week already ... taxpayer2000 Jan 2013 #16
This is already a Facebook meme davidpdx Jan 2013 #19
Also, its a myth FarrenH Jan 2013 #20
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Opponents Play The Hitler...»Reply #9