Reply #26

In the discussion thread: NDAA 2013 - Indefinite detention without trial is back [View all]

Response to rhett o rick (Reply #25)

Sat Dec 22, 2012, 10:39 AM

green for victory (591 posts)

26. The American people have looked the other way while our government violates the Constitution

*not* This American.

There Was an uproar when bush did it. You didn't hear it.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

32 replies	Author	Time	Post
NDAA 2013 - Indefinite detention without trial is back [View all]	naaman fletcher	Dec 2012	OP
How about a source NOT from RT? n/t	a geek named Bob	Dec 2012	#1
Would you accept, say, the NY Times?	naaman fletcher	Dec 2012	#2
much better!	a geek named Bob	Dec 2012	#3
I don't get it... why would Carl Levin put this back on the table?	lib2DaBone	Dec 2012	#4
The proposed NDAA for 2013 doesn’t clarify what constitutes a (belligerent)	Rwolf	Dec 2012	#21
"he awarded himself"?	CitizenPatriot	Dec 2012	#5
Bullcrap. If he signs is he buys it. nm	rhett o rick	Dec 2012	#10
Sure are a lot of RT bashers	just1voice	Dec 2012	#19
us media is utterly worthless	green for victory	Dec 2012	#22
The government does not have the right to detain citizens indefinitely without habeas & due process.	Vattel	Dec 2012	#6
LOL. Are you being sarcastic? The government has detained citizens indefinitely w/o habeas corpus.	rhett o rick	Dec 2012	#11
You need to distinguish doing something and having a right to do it.	Vattel	Dec 2012	#23
My point is that if we citizens dont care that the government is walking on our rights	rhett o rick	Dec 2012	#25
The American people have looked the other way while our government violates the Constitution	green for victory	Dec 2012	#26
Not sure why you think that you need to tell me that. I was of course	rhett o rick	Dec 2012	#27
Sorry, I missed your point. I guess we agree.	Vattel	Dec 2012	#28
Sometimes my points are a little hard to follow. At least for myself.	rhett o rick	Dec 2012	#29
George Takei is one of many Japanese US citizens who spent years in US prison camps during WWII.	Fire Walk With Me	Dec 2012	#14
Obama did not have to sign this monstrosity. He also didn't have to send lawyers to reinstate it	Fire Walk With Me	Dec 2012	#7
Those of us that thought that when we got a Democrat in the presidency, what Bush screwed up would	rhett o rick	Dec 2012	#12
Did he sign it this year	democrattotheend	Dec 2012	#20
No, the 2012 NDAA has not been signed.	tammywammy	Dec 2012	#24
Obama WANTS Indefinite Detention in the bill.	blkmusclmachine	Dec 2012	#8
Would you expect a president to give away power? nm	rhett o rick	Dec 2012	#30
well election season is indeed over it seems	azurnoir	Dec 2012	#9
You don't know about NDAA section 1021, HR347, the Patriot Act extension, etc.?	Fire Walk With Me	Dec 2012	#15
no I was simply being circumspect in my reply n/t	azurnoir	Dec 2012	#16
What we really need need is scotus to rule it	cstanleytech	Dec 2012	#13
not a frickin chance with this scotus. and since 9/11 the courts have usually been pretty wimpy on	struggle4progress	Dec 2012	#18
I think they have had two chances to rule on it and have blundered both times. nm	rhett o rick	Dec 2012	#31
You came for Their	Is That All There Is	Dec 2012	#17
No one "opened the Document for interpretation," The Constitution has been open for	rhett o rick	Dec 2012	#32

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.