Reply #21

In the discussion thread: Second Highest-Ranking GOP Senator Says He’ll Oppose Hagel For Defense Dept. [View all]

Fri Dec 21, 2012, 02:28 PM

plethoro (594 posts)

21. Exactly. Is anyone but a relative few starting to understand what

has happened, who is controlling, and how sending emails and nasty letters to congresspeople will do exactly nothing. This country is under Inverse Fascist Control by rich banksters here and abroad.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

73 replies	Author	Time	Post
Second Highest-Ranking GOP Senator Says He’ll Oppose Hagel For Defense Dept. [View all]	DonViejo	Dec 2012	OP
Why doesn't Obama just ask Netanyahu	Jackpine Radical	Dec 2012	#1
Exactly. Is anyone but a relative few starting to understand what	plethoro	Dec 2012	#21
Bingo!	Eric the Reddish	Dec 2012	#59
That's what AIPAC wants.	Joe Bacon	Dec 2012	#62
You beat me to it.	kelliekat44	Dec 2012	#68
Great. I'm for Hagel, if it upsets Cornyn	TheCowsCameHome	Dec 2012	#2
I'm with you.	malibea	Dec 2012	#13
Nothing pisses me off more	Kelvin Mace	Dec 2012	#39
You do realize Cornyn is opposing him because he prefers	TwilightGardener	Dec 2012	#43
Again, WHY are we appointing a conservative	Kelvin Mace	Dec 2012	#46
Well, we don't want to pull out another sitting Senator or Congress	TwilightGardener	Dec 2012	#47
Wes Clark would be my first choice	Kelvin Mace	Dec 2012	#49
I don't care if it's a male or a female, or whatever nationality or race.	TwilightGardener	Dec 2012	#50
good idea, why not Clark?	wordpix	Dec 2012	#72
He's Libertarian as far as foreign policy.	joshcryer	Dec 2012	#57
me, too and Cornyn is lowest type of repuke	wordpix	Dec 2012	#71
Wait, Hagel is a Republican, isn't he?	brett_jv	Dec 2012	#3
different post	Enrique	Dec 2012	#6
You still don't get it, do you?	malibea	Dec 2012	#14
crazy, isn't it. n/t	BlueToTheBone	Dec 2012	#17
Crazy is not the word I would use here!	malibea	Dec 2012	#24
Yes, malevolent would be a better word.	BlueToTheBone	Dec 2012	#64
+1	JustAnotherGen	Dec 2012	#26
I think both parties are trying to poison potential nominees before they come up	davidpdx	Dec 2012	#65
Maybe because he is listed as a republican	malibea	Dec 2012	#69
I didn't realize Israel was the 51st state.	geek tragedy	Dec 2012	#4
i want to see the spectacle	Enrique	Dec 2012	#5
Right. And if Obama keeps bending to their demands like he appears to have done with Rice,	Texin	Dec 2012	#20
Typical...	Roy Rolling	Dec 2012	#7
Sorry Chuck but more Ds then Rs in the senate and when / Reid ....	Botany	Dec 2012	#8
Cool. I'd love to see a Democrat heading defense.	merrily	Dec 2012	#9
Jeez. There are reasons to be against Hagel at Defense, but this one is not one.	Mass	Dec 2012	#10
If the President is for it they're against it...	Historic NY	Dec 2012	#11
As a Texan, let me just say this...	Bucky	Dec 2012	#12
Ask him if he swore to represent the US or Israel.	alfredo	Dec 2012	#23
I'll second that..	cannabis_flower	Dec 2012	#34
And let's not get started on your Governor....nt	pkdu	Dec 2012	#51
As a Texan I agree with you and add John Culberson is worse than the Senators.	Thinkingabout	Dec 2012	#54
Kerry Is Being Nominated For Secretary of State	DallasNE	Dec 2012	#15
I agree.	malibea	Dec 2012	#27
I know. Hagel's views on Israel are not even pertinent to being Sec of Defense.	Jennicut	Dec 2012	#70
Cornyn is a nutjob	Joey Liberal	Dec 2012	#16
To hell with Cornyn. Just another obstructionist Repukian.	olegramps	Dec 2012	#18
You are totally right-on!	malibea	Dec 2012	#28
don`t tell johnnie boy that the sec of transportation is a republican too......	madrchsod	Dec 2012	#19
We need to ask Cornyn where his loyalty lies. Is it the US or Israel. He needs to make a choice.	alfredo	Dec 2012	#22
Amen!	malibea	Dec 2012	#30
I'm not sure if Israel would return the same level of loyalty they expect of us.	alfredo	Dec 2012	#44
I would bet against it!	malibea	Dec 2012	#53
I was an Army spook during the USS Liberty murders. I lost a lot of trust for	alfredo	Dec 2012	#55
They are trying to dictate to Obama what his foreign/defense policy	TwilightGardener	Dec 2012	#25
Yep!	malibea	Dec 2012	#31
Honestly. Who cares what Republicans think anymore. They are frail and flailing. They should be	The Wielding Truth	Dec 2012	#29
Love your statements!	malibea	Dec 2012	#32
Thanks. I think this cowering to these spoiled fools is ridiculous.	The Wielding Truth	Dec 2012	#35
Could not agree with you more.	malibea	Dec 2012	#37
I don't want the President	leftynyc	Dec 2012	#33
This is all about the neocons and the MIC trying to keep their	TwilightGardener	Dec 2012	#36
That didn't answer my question	leftynyc	Dec 2012	#38
I don't think his being a Repub is a factor at all. It's more of a	TwilightGardener	Dec 2012	#40
It should be a factor	leftynyc	Dec 2012	#41
If he's nominated, I'm sure he'll be questioned. He will serve	TwilightGardener	Dec 2012	#42
But why not nominate a Democrat?	leftynyc	Dec 2012	#45
Well, if that's your most important criteria for the job, then I can't	TwilightGardener	Dec 2012	#48
Wesley Clark, Jim Webb	leftynyc	Dec 2012	#60
I support Hagel.	David__77	Dec 2012	#52
Yeah, for DoD I think it's OK.	joshcryer	Dec 2012	#58
I wish the president would consider Jim Webb.	w8liftinglady	Dec 2012	#56
Washington Post outraged with Hagel claiming he might push Obama well to the left on foreign policy	Douglas Carpenter	Dec 2012	#61
F the WHORESHINGTON POST!	Joe Bacon	Dec 2012	#63
Chuck Hagel would push President Obama to the left?	janx	Dec 2012	#66
at least his public positions - at least up to now - left of the first term of the Obama Administrat	Douglas Carpenter	Dec 2012	#67
how about Colin Powell? or is he too tainted from * Admin?	wordpix	Dec 2012	#73

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.