Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: NDAA 2013 - Indefinite detention without trial is back [View all]CitizenPatriot
(3,783 posts)5. "he awarded himself"?
I was unaware that Obama was a senator currently.
they do realize he doesn't have line item veto powers, right? that he had to fund the military and he issued the signing statement to inform how the law would be interpreted under his administration. He also made them go back and redo this POS so it was less egregious than when they started?
RT ... Sorry. I'll read the NYT. Serious issue that needs to be addressed but not by people who don't even understand how our government works.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The government does not have the right to detain citizens indefinitely without habeas & due process.
Vattel
Dec 2012
#6
LOL. Are you being sarcastic? The government has detained citizens indefinitely w/o habeas corpus.
rhett o rick
Dec 2012
#11
My point is that if we citizens dont care that the government is walking on our rights
rhett o rick
Dec 2012
#25
The American people have looked the other way while our government violates the Constitution
green for victory
Dec 2012
#26
George Takei is one of many Japanese US citizens who spent years in US prison camps during WWII.
Fire Walk With Me
Dec 2012
#14
Obama did not have to sign this monstrosity. He also didn't have to send lawyers to reinstate it
Fire Walk With Me
Dec 2012
#7
Those of us that thought that when we got a Democrat in the presidency, what Bush screwed up would
rhett o rick
Dec 2012
#12
You don't know about NDAA section 1021, HR347, the Patriot Act extension, etc.?
Fire Walk With Me
Dec 2012
#15
not a frickin chance with this scotus. and since 9/11 the courts have usually been pretty wimpy on
struggle4progress
Dec 2012
#18
I think they have had two chances to rule on it and have blundered both times. nm
rhett o rick
Dec 2012
#31
No one "opened the Document for interpretation," The Constitution has been open for
rhett o rick
Dec 2012
#32