Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
11. The Tsuruga unit was completed in 1966
Wed Dec 12, 2012, 10:23 PM
Dec 2012

That is, more than 45 years ago when much, much less was known about geological faults in the area. Although the city of Fukui up the Sea of Japan coast from Tsuruga had had a major earthquake in 1948, it was thought at the time that Tsuruga was in a more stable geological area and that the seismic design of the unit could withstand a similar earthquake. Also, the Tsuruga unit is in a relatively sparsely populated area, and Fukui Prefecture (where Tsuruga is located) welcomed the reactor at the time because it would bring lots of jobs and money to what had been a fairly poor area of the country.

The most ill-conceived idea man has come up with madokie Dec 2012 #1
We're not "stopping global warming." joshcryer Dec 2012 #2
Nope. In fact....... NickB79 Dec 2012 #10
Meh. What could possibly go wrong? VWolf Dec 2012 #3
And so... marions ghost Dec 2012 #4
So you are asking...whose fault is it? dixiegrrrrl Dec 2012 #6
yeah marions ghost Dec 2012 #7
*rimshot* sakabatou Dec 2012 #8
was wondering if anyone would get it. dixiegrrrrl Dec 2012 #9
The Tsuruga unit was completed in 1966 Art_from_Ark Dec 2012 #11
They got lucky marions ghost Dec 2012 #12
They did get lucky Art_from_Ark Dec 2012 #13
I agree with 3 out of 4 of your claims OP. cstanleytech Dec 2012 #5
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»UPDATE: Tsuruga nuclear p...»Reply #11