Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Duchess hoax: Australian radio station 'sought permission' [View all]yellowcanine
(35,698 posts)35. Ah - unauthorized release of medical information is not "a little prank."
It is a crime in most places, Australia included, I am guessing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Acknowledging they knew the DJs needed permission certainly doesn't help their case.
Hassin Bin Sober
Dec 2012
#4
Phone records from the station and hospital, showing the times and lengths of each call, would help.
DRoseDARs
Dec 2012
#6
Oh come on yourself. Did you read anything I typed there? I'm not taking a position as I don't care.
DRoseDARs
Dec 2012
#12
Heck, I think a dog gets that, too. Who's kidding who here? Another corporate CYA.
freshwest
Dec 2012
#9
Comedy is a thing which can not be self declared. That is, no laughs, it ain't comedy.
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2012
#17
a call to Scott Walker in his office is different than a call to a nurse in a hospital
Beaverhausen
Dec 2012
#31
I rank "prank" calls to hospitals in the same category as "prank" calls to 911
magical thyme
Dec 2012
#41
That's one way to rationalize the maintenance of mean-spirited behavior...
LanternWaste
Dec 2012
#26
Well hooey then they should not have broadcast it. That is not an excuse, it is a confession.
yellowcanine
Dec 2012
#33