Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

rocktivity

(44,572 posts)

1. I hope the reason why they didn't report on the conversation

Reply to Omaha Steve (Original post)

Sun Dec 9, 2012, 06:00 PM

Dec 2012

was because there was none. And there doesn't NEED to be one because THERE IS NO IMPASSE -- Obama is holding all the cards.

I hope that all Obama did was sit back in his chair with his feet on the desk and a smile on his face.

rocktivity

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Obama, Boehner meet to discuss 'fiscal cliff' [View all] Omaha Steve Dec 2012 OP

I hope the reason why they didn't report on the conversation rocktivity Dec 2012 #1

This Is Proceeding Along The Lines Expected DallasNE Dec 2012 #2

No. Obama gets 98%, and Republicans get 2%. Panasonic Dec 2012 #5

Social Security has nothing to do with the deficit Angry Dragon Dec 2012 #3

Keep saying that! xtraxritical Dec 2012 #4

+1 grahamhgreen Dec 2012 #12

Remember "Now is not the time to point fingers." and.... Hotler Dec 2012 #6

Be specific with your prediction. When will those cuts occur, and how big will they be? JoePhilly Dec 2012 #8

You mean like a concrete date and time????? If I could predict that I would be rich. Hotler Dec 2012 #14

And DADT was never going to be over turned ... and Obama was never going to JoePhilly Dec 2012 #15

Last time Boehner got 98% of everything the GOP wanted. blkmusclmachine Dec 2012 #7

Please. Boehner The Great Leader and Master Strategist? Worse Congress Ever. TomCADem Dec 2012 #10

Waste of time, Boehner Has No Pull. Worse... TomCADem Dec 2012 #9

How many have read 'Shock Doctrine' and understood some of it? delrem Dec 2012 #11

The President's John2 Dec 2012 #16

"the two men agreed to not release details of the conversation" - lack of transparency is grahamhgreen Dec 2012 #13