Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

earthside

(6,960 posts)
6. The judge is correct.
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 11:21 AM
Dec 2012

Sorry ... but as much as the proponents of 'gay conversion' are crazy, hateful, mean-spirited, etc., it is antithetical to the First Amendment for the government to stop individuals and groups from acting on their beliefs.

As long as no coercion or violence is involved, I support the right of religious nuts to be nutty.

I support the rights of alternative cancer treatment folks to even endanger their own lives and to make the argument for their viewpoint.

Liberals do favor liberty, you know.

Bullshitza! Homosexuality isn't in the DSM. longship Dec 2012 #1
Neither is homeopathy and a bunch of other quackery. AtheistCrusader Dec 2012 #7
Why to go judge, let's heap more misery on gay people, you know, free speech RKP5637 Dec 2012 #2
California: only State in history to revoke existing rights from their own. Bluenorthwest Dec 2012 #3
Another Dumb-Fuck judge Plucketeer Dec 2012 #4
Seems to be Democrat. happyslug Dec 2012 #11
The future obama2terms Dec 2012 #5
The judge is correct. earthside Dec 2012 #6
Important to regulate/control though. AtheistCrusader Dec 2012 #8
While I do see your point sdfernando Dec 2012 #9
So you are ok with Child Abuse? dbackjon Dec 2012 #10
Even the State Legislature did NOT make that claim. happyslug Dec 2012 #13
So you are ok with CHILD FUCKING ABUSE? dbackjon Dec 2012 #14
Have you dealt with Child Abuse, I have represented people in child abuse cases happyslug Dec 2012 #18
Then you don't have a fucking clue about this then dbackjon Dec 2012 #20
Stevie Wonder could have seen that one coming slackmaster Dec 2012 #12
I think that was the wrong decision. Quantess Dec 2012 #15
ACLU was silent. It was opposed by several associations representing counselors and therapists. slackmaster Dec 2012 #16
therapists like bachmans husband get their claws on easy state and federal taxpayer billions Sunlei Dec 2012 #17
How does it inhibit their free speech? blackspade Dec 2012 #19
What's next? dem4ward Dec 2012 #21
Locking - duplicate thread muriel_volestrangler Dec 2012 #22
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge Blocks California B...»Reply #6