Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Matariki

(18,775 posts)
21. I'm sure it's more about not wanting to encounter someone of a different class on *their* street.
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 06:08 AM
Jan 2012

I mean "aawkwaaard", right?

What a crazy rule. I mean the maid is in the house all day. There must be some trust there. southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #1
Oh but that is THEIR own maid... MicaelS Jan 2012 #2
Really crazy isn't it. Why would the an employee want to robb the neighbor and put the job on the southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #6
It's beyond crazy. It's reprehensible. n/t pnwmom Jan 2012 #12
If I were the maids I sure start a boycott southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #13
I'm sure it's more about not wanting to encounter someone of a different class on *their* street. Matariki Jan 2012 #21
Totally right. LOL southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #25
Sounds like what the 1% wants for all of us. Denninmi Jan 2012 #3
+1 txlibdem Jan 2012 #4
You see the future clearly. BeHereNow Jan 2012 #16
"The workers walking in the street and the children on bicycles?" Warpy Jan 2012 #5
Sounds like the south in the years before (and to some extent after) the civil rights movement. nt MADem Jan 2012 #7
Pinochet's legacy. nt valerief Jan 2012 #8
Exactly! DBoon Jan 2012 #15
As if their neighbor's maid were a dog roaming loose in the street. Quantess Jan 2012 #9
Unbelievable rationale given by the administration. From the article: Judi Lynn Jan 2012 #10
Remember, in Bolivia, the indigenous Bolivian people were not allowed to walk on the sidewalks. Judi Lynn Jan 2012 #11
100% correct malaise Jan 2012 #22
I don't like it, but what's the solution? David__77 Jan 2012 #14
Well, if that's the case, then maybe the rich people who live in them can Cleita Jan 2012 #18
They can, and perhaps should, but... David__77 Jan 2012 #20
Someday there will be no response? No, not without our efforts to change how things are CreekDog Jan 2012 #27
Think harder CreekDog Jan 2012 #26
Yes and no. After all, the sidewalks are public accommodations. Bucky Jan 2012 #33
Reminds me of Beverly Hills in the sixties. Cleita Jan 2012 #17
Reminds me of Rosa Parks refusing to SIT at the back of the bus.... nt riderinthestorm Jan 2012 #19
It might well be LA in the 2020s as well. Bucky Jan 2012 #32
It's just the same in fenced off rich communities in the US. fasttense Jan 2012 #23
Is it time carla Jan 2012 #24
No need to go to Chile. Beacool Jan 2012 #28
I like the solution by the employer on her side muriel_volestrangler Jan 2012 #29
Hah! nt Lucky Luciano Jan 2012 #30
Badass. boppers Jan 2012 #31
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Civil rights in Chile: Ma...»Reply #21