Reply #94

In the discussion thread: What if O.J. didn’t do it? Film suggests serial killer—not Simpson—murdered Brown, Goldman [View all]

Response to AlbertCat (Reply #69)

Mon Nov 19, 2012, 11:34 PM

Major Nikon (9,717 posts)

94. It's not as if there isn't a wealth of information on this already

I've yet to hear anyone who thinks Simpson didn't do it explain why a very rare size 12 Bruno Magli shoe prints in blood were found at the murder scene, which were the very shoes Simpson was photographed wearing yet claimed he never owned. So even if you can discount all the other circumstantial evidence which points directly at OJ (which alone is a pretty good trick), the shoes pretty much seals the deal.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

176 replies	Author	Time	Post
What if O.J. didn’t do it? Film suggests serial killer—not Simpson—murdered Brown, Goldman [View all]	TPaine7	Nov 2012	OP
Uh huh	ProudToBeBlueInRhody	Nov 2012	#1
The History channel ran that documentary. I couldn't believe it!	aaaaaa5a	Nov 2012	#28
Why? If you knew more of the facts you might think differently.	Laura PourMeADrink	Nov 2012	#46
Do you think LBJ had JFK assassinated? nt	aaaaaa5a	Nov 2012	#51
referring to the slam of History channel only	Laura PourMeADrink	Nov 2012	#65
Most of the shows History now runs engage in speculation and theory	ProudToBeBlueInRhody	Nov 2012	#78
Isn't it still history that people are speculating and have alternate theories	Laura PourMeADrink	Nov 2012	#83
Speculating and theorizing on events that aren't even in evidence....	ProudToBeBlueInRhody	Nov 2012	#95
There is speculation...	Archae	Nov 2012	#96
No. That is not considered history. Not by any reputable historian in the world.	cali	Nov 2012	#156
What??	william cail	Nov 2012	#168
is this the knives guy?	bluemarkers	Nov 2012	#68
My favorites....	CuriousAboutPolls	Nov 2012	#121
Nothing the History Channel does surprises me	Scootaloo	Nov 2012	#130
Yeah, What's With The History Channel .. They Have An Agenda ..	YOHABLO	Nov 2012	#147
Was that part of the BBC series	dflprincess	Nov 2012	#57
I think it was	ProudToBeBlueInRhody	Nov 2012	#72
I remember it was interesting	dflprincess	Nov 2012	#81
Their wild possibilities seemed endless	ProudToBeBlueInRhody	Nov 2012	#100
I don't recall that all the speculation was that wild	dflprincess	Nov 2012	#112
Really? How about their speculation about the Corsican hit team?	stopbush	Nov 2012	#155
Occam's Razor >>>>>>>>> Endless Possibilities/nt	DemocratSinceBirth	Nov 2012	#172
From what I saw, the verdict was 100% correct. NOT GUILTY aka INNOCENT	graham4anything	Nov 2012	#2
Not Guilty is not the same as innocent	ProudToBeBlueInRhody	Nov 2012	#8
It was in this case.And I am Juror #8. Just like I would vote guilty for Zimmerman 1st degree.	graham4anything	Nov 2012	#24
Yes, it is unconstitutional for the gov't to try a person twice. And he wasn't.	DRoseDARs	Nov 2012	#42
Uh, the trials were for different crimes.	Zoeisright	Nov 2012	#122
He was not tied twice...	awoke_in_2003	Nov 2012	#135
Sorry. There is nothing whatsoever unconstitutional in	kestrel91316	Nov 2012	#141
So, if somebody is charged with Crime A and is found not guilty,	kestrel91316	Nov 2012	#142
His Lynchings still occur in racist America, he will get a new trial someday	graham4anything	Nov 2012	#150
Racism. Homophobia, Anti-Semitism Are Still Rife In Our World	DemocratSinceBirth	Nov 2012	#171
MOUNTAINS of evidence PROVES he did it. He was found "guilty" in the civil trial. The acquittal in	RBInMaine	Nov 2012	#163
I too listened to the entire trial and agree. The jury had to acquit based on the evidence presented	riderinthestorm	Nov 2012	#3
IF I DID IT	Skittles	Nov 2012	#4
O.J.'s guilt is one thing I've never doubted	Blasphemer	Nov 2012	#87
I agree with you on the look on Mr. Kardashian's face	Skittles	Nov 2012	#146
Skittles, I love your posts, I love your outlook, but I watched that entire trial. No way could you	chimpymustgo	Nov 2012	#157
sorry, not even worth my time	Skittles	Nov 2012	#158
Why Would The Cops Frame OJ? They Loved Him	DemocratSinceBirth	Nov 2012	#174
I completely agree with you	Nightjock	Nov 2012	#175
I wouldn't doubt that OJ hired a killer	lbrtbell	Nov 2012	#167
This'll be good...	Ken Burch	Nov 2012	#5
Can't act? He was SUPERB as Nordberg in the Naked Gun series. Superb.	MADem	Nov 2012	#15
Did you post that with a straight face?	Ken Burch	Nov 2012	#20
Yes, I did. He had great comedic timing, made all the more enjoyable because it was so unexpected.	MADem	Nov 2012	#37
Comedic chops are one thing...acting convincingly as if you HADN'T just carved up two humans	Ken Burch	Nov 2012	#43
he's a sociopath, just like rmoney	bluemarkers	Nov 2012	#59
You may have something there.	Ken Burch	Nov 2012	#61
Some of the best actors don't give a shit about anyone but themselves.	MADem	Nov 2012	#124
He was SUPERB as Nordberg in the Naked Gun series.	AlbertCat	Nov 2012	#70
Psychopaths are completely capable of acting as you describe.	Zoeisright	Nov 2012	#123
Whether OJ did it or not, the prosecutors certainly did not manage	JDPriestly	Nov 2012	#6
What were the problems with the timeline?	Major Nikon	Nov 2012	#31
Read the book "OJ is innocent and I can prove it" by William Dear	Laura PourMeADrink	Nov 2012	#53
So you want me to read a one sided book from someone who is profiting from this?	Major Nikon	Nov 2012	#91
Actually yes to all, I think. He was there, at the murder site, but he didn't do it.	Laura PourMeADrink	Nov 2012	#92
Convienient	Major Nikon	Nov 2012	#97
duh	Laura PourMeADrink	Nov 2012	#104
And you paid money for this book?	Major Nikon	Nov 2012	#119
I just wish I could vote this up like you can vote up responses on reddit!	DeltaLitProf	Nov 2012	#132
Time line Schmime line	AlbertCat	Nov 2012	#69
It's not as if there isn't a wealth of information on this already	Major Nikon	Nov 2012	#94
Those were only presented in the civil case, not the criminal case. Apples and oranges	riderinthestorm	Nov 2012	#111
Then we agree	Major Nikon	Nov 2012	#126
Unfortunately size 13 are not uncommon	NavyMom	Nov 2012	#143
ZERO DOUBT	chuckstevens	Nov 2012	#7
Many innocent men have fled.	TPaine7	Nov 2012	#10
A black man accused of murdering a WHITE woman and a WHITE man would most likely	madinmaryland	Nov 2012	#14
A famous black man who was quite wealthy who could (and did) buy the best defense available	Major Nikon	Nov 2012	#36
OJ's defense team was the criminal defense all-stars.	amandabeech	Nov 2012	#66
OJ's defense team was the criminal defense all-stars.	AlbertCat	Nov 2012	#76
Turning a trial around someone other than the defendant is about the best	amandabeech	Nov 2012	#86
They did their absolute best for their client, OJ.	AlbertCat	Nov 2012	#118
The Facts are IMHO	LovingA2andMI	Nov 2012	#149
Not only that, OJ was no average anything	Major Nikon	Nov 2012	#101
if he were black and facing a white police department with a deeply racist history(like the LAPD)	Ken Burch	Nov 2012	#18
I don't know if he did it or not.. always "thought" he did though.. and	Cha	Nov 2012	#52
Fred Goldman is entitled to his grief and his rage about his son's loss.	Ken Burch	Nov 2012	#64
I think he's entitled to his money and it does not make him look like any	Cha	Nov 2012	#71
OK...he's legally entitled...but it's icky that he spent so much time actually trying to collect.	Ken Burch	Nov 2012	#84
It's Moot Because O J Did Everything Within His Power To Escape The Judgment	DemocratSinceBirth	Nov 2012	#93
How About The Parents That Lose A Child To A Drunk Driver Or An Negligent Physician?	DemocratSinceBirth	Nov 2012	#88
Not the same thing, really.	Ken Burch	Nov 2012	#115
What a repulsive thing to say.	Zoeisright	Nov 2012	#125
He should focus on healing his family.	Ken Burch	Nov 2012	#128
Walked off an Alaska Air flight at SeaTac and was really weird.	PufPuf23	Nov 2012	#22
I was walking through downtown Juneau that day, and in every bar on Franklin Street(the main drag)	Ken Burch	Nov 2012	#58
Not just that, there was a THICK and CLEAR blood trail and other evidence clearly PROVING he did it.	RBInMaine	Nov 2012	#165
Did he own Bruno Magli shoes?	jberryhill	Nov 2012	#9
A celebrity will never be convicted in LA	ProudToBeBlueInRhody	Nov 2012	#35
It took 3 tries to convict the Menendez brothers and they confessed	Major Nikon	Nov 2012	#39
I've noticed that.	yardwork	Nov 2012	#54
The prosecution blew the case and the police planted evidence.	yardwork	Nov 2012	#56
The civil trial was much more interesting	jberryhill	Nov 2012	#79
There's a problem with that guy's fantasy.	MADem	Nov 2012	#11
I didn't read that to mean immediately prior to the killing. It didn't even occur to me that he	TPaine7	Nov 2012	#16
That would have messed up her relationship with Mr. Goldman.	MADem	Nov 2012	#40
Surely your aren't implying that...	TPaine7	Nov 2012	#102
I'm not implying anything. I said what I said and I was quite clear.	MADem	Nov 2012	#109
read book	Laura PourMeADrink	Nov 2012	#55
Read "Murder in Brentwood"	AlbertCat	Nov 2012	#82
old news. this book is more current and a result of years of investigation - investigation	Laura PourMeADrink	Nov 2012	#85
old news.	AlbertCat	Nov 2012	#117
The most dangerous man (or woman) is one who has only read one book	atre	Nov 2012	#139
You are fact challenged.	TPaine7	Nov 2012	#148
Challenge me.	atre	Nov 2012	#153
I have 100 per cent doubt that OJ did it. The Rampart	plethoro	Nov 2012	#12
I Thought The Rampart Division Is In Downtown L A . I Am Pretty Sure It Is. Near Koreatown	DemocratSinceBirth	Nov 2012	#103
I think evidence was both planted and maybe tampered. I am having trouble with "are not mutually	plethoro	Nov 2012	#138
Had the Judge allowed the following evidence in, the verdict may have turned out differently...	AKing	Nov 2012	#13
Why would fibers from a man's vehicle being on his ex's person or on a cap she had be surprising? nt	TPaine7	Nov 2012	#19
Besides the cap,the fibers were also on the bloody gloves. They obviously...	AKing	Nov 2012	#41
By the time Cochran got through with the fiber evidence, they would have released Wayne Williams	alcibiades_mystery	Nov 2012	#137
Too many people invested half their 1990s thinking about this case...	JackRiddler	Nov 2012	#17
OJ	BeyondGeography	Nov 2012	#21
I am guessing that you haven't seen the crime photos	grantcart	Nov 2012	#23
Threads like this cause me to doubt humanity	atre	Nov 2012	#25
Do you think that Ron Goldman's fists had extensive bruising because he repeatedly punched a wall	TPaine7	Nov 2012	#44
omg...someone who knows the facts of the case !	Laura PourMeADrink	Nov 2012	#80
Nah, I can afford it and I may consider buying it.	TPaine7	Nov 2012	#108
well, it's 576	Laura PourMeADrink	Nov 2012	#113
I agree 100%!!	SkyDaddy7	Nov 2012	#48
Here is that 911 call, in case people have forgotten.	grantcart	Nov 2012	#49
Oh my ....I missed all of this	Tumbulu	Nov 2012	#131
No, it was not the night of the murder.	FlaGranny	Nov 2012	#169
comments like this make me cringe. It is an insult to one's intelligence for someone who doesn't	Laura PourMeADrink	Nov 2012	#60
Yeah, I try to give people a pass on the first gratuitous insult and deal strictly with the logic.	TPaine7	Nov 2012	#73
Nope	atre	Nov 2012	#134
Now you are compounding the insult.	TPaine7	Nov 2012	#144
In America, any successful black person is one they try to bring down. Every single time.	graham4anything	Nov 2012	#26
Denzel Washington has been arrested for murder?	ProudToBeBlueInRhody	Nov 2012	#29
Patience, patience... (just kidding)	TPaine7	Nov 2012	#50
What complete bullshit.	Zoeisright	Nov 2012	#127
NOTHING to do with race. Don't go there. VAST evidence PROVES Simpson did this.	RBInMaine	Nov 2012	#162
I watched the whole trial... O.J. did it.....	ProudProgressiveNow	Nov 2012	#27
That is CRAZY. No one was framed. MOUNTAINS of objective evidence PROVE Simpson did it.	RBInMaine	Nov 2012	#164
I have no doubt OJ Simpson was guilty of two murders.	MicaelS	Nov 2012	#30
Once police (or the state) has been determined to lie about anything in a particular case	aaaaaa5a	Nov 2012	#32
I didn't know ANYONE who thought he was guilty.	David__77	Nov 2012	#33
Great comment ! Thanks for not saying you know "100%" since you haven't studied the case. nt	Laura PourMeADrink	Nov 2012	#62
And what if I wrote Harry Potter?	MrSlayer	Nov 2012	#34
Could Be Innocent	elbloggoZY27	Nov 2012	#38
The serial killer could also disclose details that only the murderer would know. n/t	TPaine7	Nov 2012	#47
What about the reward he offered?	SoapBox	Nov 2012	#45
He said he was going to personally hunt down the killer. Of course, he couldn't do that.	Honeycombe8	Nov 2012	#99
OJ promised to look for the real killer after his acquittal	bluestateguy	Nov 2012	#63
Be fair, there are a LOT of golf courses to check... n/t	DRoseDARs	Nov 2012	#74
He didn't want to pay me the reward	jberryhill	Nov 2012	#90
Please lets not go there again...	SleeplessinSoCal	Nov 2012	#67
Agreed. My entire fall semester in 1998 was lost to the trial... in high school freshman Spanish.	DRoseDARs	Nov 2012	#77
that's interesting.... wonder what makes some people care less and some more in an unsolved	Laura PourMeADrink	Nov 2012	#89
Probably because they don't think it's unsolved. nt	Union Scribe	Nov 2012	#106
but that's the difference. Hyper-Analytical people would never say something is 100% solved.	Laura PourMeADrink	Nov 2012	#114
Sounds like a difficult existence to be "hyper-analytical" then	Union Scribe	Nov 2012	#116
I always thought the police framed the right person	mitchtv	Nov 2012	#75
Tricks are for kids. In other words, O J did it. All that's missing is the actual video of him doing	Honeycombe8	Nov 2012	#98
It's not the first time the cops framed a guilty man. That case was a total cluster.	brewens	Nov 2012	#105
The case against O.J. Was ironclad	Kelvin Mace	Nov 2012	#107
"Glen told him he had been "partying" with Brown Simpson prior to her June 12, 1994, killing."	DemocratSinceBirth	Nov 2012	#110
What a bunch of pathetic bullshit.	Zoeisright	Nov 2012	#120
so...what size glove did this guy wear?	olddad56	Nov 2012	#129
I have a bridge for sale...	awoke_in_2003	Nov 2012	#133
I'll sell you one if you think the blood went through OJ's ankle as he wore it,	TPaine7	Nov 2012	#136
OJ wrote a book confessing. Can I take my $10,000 in small bills?	atre	Nov 2012	#140
Not the ends, the sides. The blood did not move from toe to calf (or shin).	TPaine7	Nov 2012	#145
Do I hear crickets?	atre	Nov 2012	#154
and then there was that corrupt old white haired cop Philip Van Asswipe or something like that	graham4anything	Nov 2012	#151
In this weasel, glens dreams maybe	madokie	Nov 2012	#152
I told friends the same thing	UCmeNdc	Nov 2012	#159
Right.	Le Taz Hot	Nov 2012	#160
TOTAL AND COMPLETE BULLSHIT ! EVERY BIT OF THE EVIDENCE PROVES SIMPSON DID IT ! GET REAL !	RBInMaine	Nov 2012	#161
I never was 100% sure he was guilty	lbrtbell	Nov 2012	#166
I Doubt This Low Life Drifter Was "Partying" With Nicole Brown Simpson	DemocratSinceBirth	Nov 2012	#170
There are "documentaries" saying the olocaust didn't happen	obamanut2012	Nov 2012	#173
Locking - not Latest Breaking News	muriel_volestrangler	Nov 2012	#176

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.