Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: FFRF sues IRS to enforce church electioneering ban [View all]AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)4. Why is a "policy of non-enforcement" applicable to war criminals, banksters, and church charlatans?
Are they all Republicans?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Calling all undercover videographers, please gather evidence and submit it to the IRS
Coyotl
Nov 2012
#17
Why is a "policy of non-enforcement" applicable to war criminals, banksters, and church charlatans?
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2012
#4
Because they have hundreds of thousands of employees, if not millions, who vote.
freshwest
Nov 2012
#22
they should probably wait. i think they (the partisan pastors) are trying to get such a lawsuit
leftyohiolib
Nov 2012
#6
taxing the church is proper - the should be rendering unto cesear ... the concern is that there will
leftyohiolib
Nov 2012
#13
I'm referring to 501(c)(3) organizations that violate the conditions of their tax-exempt status
slackmaster
Nov 2012
#24
I managed a campaign in a local election in 2008. I saw that happen repeatedly.
slackmaster
Nov 2012
#34
Often the political activities that organizations engage in have no tax consequences or visibility
slackmaster
Nov 2012
#16