HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Federal Judge Rules Again... » Reply #5
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Response to octoberlib (Original post)

Tue Nov 13, 2012, 07:05 PM

5. McClellan didn't speak correctly

From this article, the judge didn't order the ID requirement removed, as McClellan is quoted. The judge said Husted violated state law by shifting the job of writing in the form of ID from the poll worker to the voter. It makes more sense for a poll worker to write in the type of ID, doesn't it, so it would be accurate? If the voter fills it in and it is wrong, that provisional ballot can be invalidated.
The judge also said that Husted said about an earlier court order that he couldn't make court ordered changes because there wasn't enough time, then turned around and made this change the Friday before election. What a slimeball Husted is, like all the way from skin to bone slimey.

I live in Ohio and I can't believe my fellow residents accept these illegal maneuvers that can affect the outcome of the election.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Please login to view edit histories.