Reply #9

In the discussion thread: Obama asks Palestinians to back off statehood push [View all]

Response to Scootaloo (Reply #1)

Sun Nov 11, 2012, 07:34 PM

awoke_in_2003 (18,498 posts)

9. More arms sales to Israel. nt

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

62 replies	Author	Time	Post
Obama asks Palestinians to back off statehood push [View all]	Freddie Stubbs	Nov 2012	OP
In exchange for what?	Scootaloo	Nov 2012	#1
Maybe then Mr. Abbas will say "no thanks" to our 1/2 billion in foreign aid we give them each year.	former9thward	Nov 2012	#3
Interesting strategy.	Scootaloo	Nov 2012	#4
Don't know what the restaurant remark is about.	former9thward	Nov 2012	#6
No, only the Isarelis get to interfere with our elections	geek tragedy	Nov 2012	#8
Re: rewarded for their efforts with unconditional aid	mallard	Nov 2012	#28
Actually I don't think that.	Scootaloo	Nov 2012	#10
I would have no problem cutting off aid to ALL players in the Mideast.	former9thward	Nov 2012	#13
I rather doubt your sincerity on that.	Scootaloo	Nov 2012	#16
BS n/t	DeSwiss	Nov 2012	#20
You always have such insightful posts.	former9thward	Nov 2012	#23
US Policymakers don't really seem to care WHAT $ is used for	Ashened	Nov 2012	#39
+1	AlexSatan	Nov 2012	#55
Try over 4 billion.	L0oniX	Nov 2012	#25
The PLA has averaged 600 million a year.	former9thward	Nov 2012	#36
Congress with held Palestinian aid last year as punishment for the UN bid then at least until Israel	azurnoir	Nov 2012	#49
In interest of accuracy the President wit held that aid.	former9thward	Nov 2012	#51
Congress holds the purse strings and Congress made the decision	azurnoir	Nov 2012	#52
Spoken like a true lord of the manor.	JackRiddler	Nov 2012	#32
So they are entitled to the money no matter what.	former9thward	Nov 2012	#37
Your questions are irrelevant.	JackRiddler	Nov 2012	#38
More arms sales to Israel. nt	awoke_in_2003	Nov 2012	#9
Ugh, still carrying water for Bibi.	geek tragedy	Nov 2012	#2
This is NOT one of the reasons I supported Obama's re-election	99th_Monkey	Nov 2012	#5
I know he should have capital but will the tea baggers thwart Obama	movonne	Nov 2012	#7
TeaBaggers in the House have no power over Obama's position on Palestine	99th_Monkey	Nov 2012	#11
Need. New. Excuses. n/t	DeSwiss	Nov 2012	#21
He is using his political capital. He's using it to bolster his policy of supporting Israel	Freddie Stubbs	Nov 2012	#35
There is NO alternative to creating a Palestinian state as soon as possible.	Ken Burch	Nov 2012	#12
The Palestinian strategy must shift to the one-state solution.	geek tragedy	Nov 2012	#15
Perhaps the Palestinians have always favored a one-state "solution."	Chef Eric	Nov 2012	#17
Arafat rejected Clinton's proposals because he knew he didn't have the support.	Rhiannon12866	Nov 2012	#27
The "peace process" was entirely unfair	cpwm17	Nov 2012	#29
Creating a state destined to fail almost immediately serves no one in the long run	hack89	Nov 2012	#18
The war is equally both sides' fault. You can't blame it all on the Palestinians	Ken Burch	Nov 2012	#50
You have it backwards	hack89	Nov 2012	#54
The two-state solution is dead	cpwm17	Nov 2012	#14
There will never be a one state solution	hack89	Nov 2012	#19
With the extreme imbalance of power	cpwm17	Nov 2012	#24
The war has to stop first	hack89	Nov 2012	#26
at the moment Hamas is not a player in this period	azurnoir	Nov 2012	#31
So Hamas does not control Gaza?	hack89	Nov 2012	#34
yes it does however the Palestinians are going to the UN about the West Bank	azurnoir	Nov 2012	#42
So if there are presently two independent Palestinian territories and governments	hack89	Nov 2012	#43
there is only one semi-independent Palestinian entity and that is Gaza it is semi	azurnoir	Nov 2012	#44
So Gaza is a problem to be solved separately?	hack89	Nov 2012	#45
at the moment that is sadly the state of things and as to your piecemeal statement that has been	azurnoir	Nov 2012	#47
I voted for him but I'm not with Obama on this one!	L0oniX	Nov 2012	#22
Is anyone really surprised??	AnOhioan	Nov 2012	#30
I'm not.	R. Daneel Olivaw	Nov 2012	#53
OK, how about instead they get the right to vote reps into the Knesset based on their population?	Ash_F	Nov 2012	#33
WHY?	lsewpershad	Nov 2012	#40
I guess he wants to follow the Democratic Party Platform when it comes to Israel	Freddie Stubbs	Nov 2012	#41
so the Democratic party platform favors occupation is that it? or more accurately	azurnoir	Nov 2012	#46
The Democratic Platform calls for "an unshakable commitment to Israel's security."	Freddie Stubbs	Nov 2012	#57
yes I'm sure those West Bank Palestinians would be rolling their tanks across the border ina flash	azurnoir	Nov 2012	#59
Many Democratic Party members favor human rights	cpwm17	Nov 2012	#56
And many Democratic Party members favor supporting Israel's security	Freddie Stubbs	Nov 2012	#58
And one DUer used to have a painting of a blue dog in his sig line.	Occulus	Nov 2012	#60
Traitor to the Democratic cause? By supporting Democratic members of Congress?	Freddie Stubbs	Nov 2012	#61
+1	Kingofalldems	Nov 2012	#62
Of course he did.	MyNameGoesHere	Nov 2012	#48

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.