Reply #7

In the discussion thread: ‘Caging’ angers voters (IA those ballots in questions were of registered Democrats) [View all]

Response to Omaha Steve (Original post)

Thu Nov 8, 2012, 07:42 PM

progressivebydesign (19,363 posts)

7. No wonder the champagne was on ice, and the fireworks ready in Boston Tuesday..

they were SURE that all of their little schemes would suppress enough of the Democratic vote, to push romney over the top. It didn't work. We voted in such numbers that even their 1,000 little schemed could not shut us down.

They simply could never win again if we actually standardized elections, and removed all of these avenues to cheat.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

46 replies	Author	Time	Post
‘Caging’ angers voters (IA those ballots in questions were of registered Democrats) [View all]	Omaha Steve	Nov 2012	OP
Can the voter find out the name of the person who challenged his/her vote?	Shrike47	Nov 2012	#1
Caging should be illegal by federal statute. Period.	Fridays Child	Nov 2012	#2
I believe it is!!!! We just don't have a Pres or AG who does anything about election fraud.	robinlynne	Nov 2012	#8
doesn't do anything about election fraud, are you for real????	groundloop	Nov 2012	#11
very very much for real. What lawsuits were prosecuted by Eric Holder, or on his behalf?	robinlynne	Nov 2012	#14
Beware people who don't know what they're talking about! Here's a partial list of suits by DOJ&Obama	Honeycombe8	Nov 2012	#18
where is the suit in FL over voter purge? I looked for it every day. Never saw a word anywhere	robinlynne	Nov 2012	#20
I just did a Google search. It's all there.	Honeycombe8	Nov 2012	#30
Thank you!	Fridays Child	Nov 2012	#37
+1. I've stopped googling for others on these subjects.	freshwest	Nov 2012	#43
You do realize	billh58	Nov 2012	#22
Where is the lawsuit the poster said Eric Holder did In Florida this year?	robinlynne	Nov 2012	#23
I am not familiar with	billh58	Nov 2012	#24
There is no information online. i looked every day for 6 or 8 weeks. Holder did not come through as	robinlynne	Nov 2012	#25
How could you look every day for 8 wks & not find what I found in 30 seconds?	Honeycombe8	Nov 2012	#45
the poster claims that Obama and Holder are on it. that there are federal lawsuits all over the pla	robinlynne	Nov 2012	#28
The DOJ filed upwards of 20 lawsuits, and sent out over 700 election monitors...	Honeycombe8	Nov 2012	#46
I did a post above with links referencing the NUMEROUS lawsuits. Also, 16 states MUST get approval	Honeycombe8	Nov 2012	#33
What is the penalty for being caught?	davidpdx	Nov 2012	#32
I hope the DOJ is paying attention.	McCamy Taylor	Nov 2012	#3
good luck with that.	robinlynne	Nov 2012	#16
They're on top of these things. Look @ my list in above post of lawsuits by DOJ & Obama.	Honeycombe8	Nov 2012	#19
Please show us. Especially FLorida which was so very public and promised by Holder. Obma did a huge	robinlynne	Nov 2012	#21
I just did a quick	billh58	Nov 2012	#26
YES! and where is the result? there was NO result. So citizens took over and made a fuss until the	robinlynne	Nov 2012	#29
I can't answer the question	billh58	Nov 2012	#35
because they did not try! Of course they can if it is a priority. That is exactly what I am saying.	robinlynne	Nov 2012	#39
Thank the DOJ and Obama for being on top of this matter, allowing him to win the election.	Honeycombe8	Nov 2012	#34
"Some group"	ThoughtCriminal	Nov 2012	#4
America beware! See this proof; these are people who think, TTE, "If you can get away with it,	patrice	Nov 2012	#5
The end does NOT justify the means. Lesson 1 in my Catholic school.	SharonAnn	Nov 2012	#13
You know? THAT's a very useful thing to talk about. It used to be much more widely	patrice	Nov 2012	#27
I remember there being research by a guy named Lawrence Kohlberg that described moral	patrice	Nov 2012	#31
KNR..thanks Steve!	Cha	Nov 2012	#6
No wonder the champagne was on ice, and the fireworks ready in Boston Tuesday..	progressivebydesign	Nov 2012	#7
If our people come out in numbers with determination	ItsTheMediaStupid	Nov 2012	#10
We need a 21st Century Reincarnation of the Voting Rights Act to end this shit	ItsTheMediaStupid	Nov 2012	#9
agreed.	robinlynne	Nov 2012	#15
I wonder if it is possible to track the sender through a postal permit	Samantha	Nov 2012	#12
Why is it even possible for my company to take you off the voter rolls?	ItsTheMediaStupid	Nov 2012	#17
I have been wondering about that as well	Samantha	Nov 2012	#40
OMG, I guess I'd better return that offer for the condo re-fi right away!	Beartracks	Nov 2012	#36
"Strangely or not so strangely, all of those ballots in questions were of registered Democrats,"	nilram	Nov 2012	#38
No one other then town officials should be allowed to submit any list like that	Marrah_G	Nov 2012	#41
So if I toss UNOFFICIAL mail from an unidentified group	csziggy	Nov 2012	#42
I always thought that "caging" meant a first class "do not forward" mailing to an individual and	yellowcanine	Nov 2012	#44

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.