Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
20. Bullshit
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 11:34 PM
Nov 2012

"she was promptly reminded that bankruptcy court is a federal entity and not beholden to arbitrary rules dictated by individual states or judges"

First off, that sentence contains an outright lie. Not only are the federal rules of procedure subject to local variation in each federal district, but they are most certainly subject to the rules of the judge assigned to the case. EVERY person at all familiar with federal litigation of any kind understands that it is crucial to familiarize oneself with the local rules of the federal court in question and any particular rules of the judge in question.

Whoever wrote that sentence does not know what the fuck they are talking about. Period.

Secondly there is no, zero, zilch significance to the timing of when a court places a paper filed in a decade-old bankruptcy on the docket. This is especially true of a paper styled as an "emergency motion" in a decade old bankruptcy proceeding. Particularly odd here is the significance assigned by the author to the timing of docketing of a claim in the case which is clearly out of time. Since the author is apparently familiar with the filing, then why not simply publish whatever it was that was filed?

There is one obvious reason for the author's coyness about publishing the filing, and I'll leave that as an exercise for the reader. But the apparent assertion that the court has ANY duty to docket whatever comes in according to some timetable set by the filer is bullshit.

Third, a non-party badgering a federal court clerk about docketing procedure is completely out of line.

shit dogCREEP will have to flee (like his grandpappy did to Mexico) the U.S. After Tomorrow... triplepoint Nov 2012 #1
triplepoint Diclotican Nov 2012 #2
I so Agree. triplepoint Nov 2012 #4
triplepoint Diclotican Nov 2012 #27
Agree with much 'Diclotican' - if he does not steal this, he may finally face a full investigation laserhaas Nov 2012 #51
Post removed Post removed Nov 2012 #64
R U 4 Real? Come on "Sinfidel"--- laserhaas Nov 2012 #66
Should I REDACT the above comment - due to "Jury results"? laserhaas Nov 2012 #71
But his assets CAN be seized and repatriated to the U.S. Treasury Panasonic Nov 2012 #6
LOL - "non-payment of some bribes" - that is so profound laserhaas Nov 2012 #52
BTW - the seizures would also be the billions Traub has and the end of MNAT & Ropes Gray laserhaas Nov 2012 #53
His money is already - Over THERE - anyway laserhaas Nov 2012 #8
laserhaas Diclotican Nov 2012 #21
Profound and Correct = "Diclotican" laserhaas Nov 2012 #25
laserhaas Diclotican Nov 2012 #28
A complicated insight - except there are pieces to the puzzle you still don't have laserhaas Nov 2012 #54
laserhaas Diclotican Nov 2012 #81
You could this morning (On Kindle) -but he has redacted it for the addition laserhaas Nov 2012 #82
I'm not so sure about the cheating part 'triplepoint' (but hope you are right) laserhaas Nov 2012 #5
Acquiring the visibility of a presidential candidate may have been burnsei sensei Nov 2012 #37
Concur 'burnsei sensei' - Haughtier is a thing to beware laserhaas Nov 2012 #55
The Repuks plan was after the election to drop the boom on Mitt so that Paul would become president awake Nov 2012 #3
I'm hoping that is true = 'awake' - that the sharks turn to eat shark laserhaas Nov 2012 #10
The integrity of the judicial process is sacrosanct - All hail Citizens United socialindependocrat Nov 2012 #7
"sarchasm" blinkie is - most definite - apropos laserhaas Nov 2012 #11
Interesting. K&R drm604 Nov 2012 #9
TY = 'drm604' laserhaas Nov 2012 #13
Rec'd and kicked! ChaoticTrilby Nov 2012 #12
You are correct "ChaoticTrilby" - last time I succeeded in stopping him cold laserhaas Nov 2012 #15
Thanks for keeping on this. Hes' not the only one who has been playing the system to loot the world. freshwest Nov 2012 #17
Wow! Really? I wasn't paying attention during the 2008 Republican primaries... ChaoticTrilby Nov 2012 #32
A REAL "Stop the Presses" transpired today laserhaas Nov 2012 #57
K&R nt ProudProgressiveNow Nov 2012 #14
TY -'ProudProgressiveNow' laserhaas Nov 2012 #16
I'm on my way to Hustler Casino to see if Larry Flynt is there laserhaas Nov 2012 #18
UPdate is the LINK to the Motion the Clerk & Judge are keeping hidden laserhaas Nov 2012 #19
Bullshit jberryhill Nov 2012 #20
trolls are not welcomed - and your the one full of it laserhaas Nov 2012 #22
And your NON party remark is absurd. The court approved of the contracts naming me as party laserhaas Nov 2012 #23
I'm on my way to Hustler - someone else please handle this twirp-ee-ness laserhaas Nov 2012 #24
A court can absolutely refuse to docket a crank motion jberryhill Nov 2012 #26
I would think they have to take it treestar Nov 2012 #39
Did you read the motion? jberryhill Nov 2012 #40
Who cares? They should have to dismiss it, not disallow it from being filed. treestar Nov 2012 #41
Nobody has "disallowed" it from being filed jberryhill Nov 2012 #42
Now you are full of bull - You read the Reporter (Rmuse's) story laserhaas Nov 2012 #49
Since when do federal clerks have any obligation to talk to reporters? jberryhill Nov 2012 #60
Stick with the facts - instead of making bogus remarks without foundation laserhaas Nov 2012 #50
Concur -'treestar' - the argument by the legal/ plant party is incongruous laserhaas Nov 2012 #43
Yeah, you got me.... jberryhill Nov 2012 #61
GOP - (Hannity/Colms) playbook 101 - call names, slur, slam laserhaas Nov 2012 #65
You really should read through... BlueNoteSpecial Nov 2012 #35
You really should read the history of crackpot court filings from this person jberryhill Nov 2012 #36
Calling names is extreme bad form and exposes your bias - R U in the legal profession? laserhaas Nov 2012 #48
Calling names? jberryhill Nov 2012 #62
Ah HA - so you ARE an attorney. Circling that "blue wall" of silence/ protection laserhaas Nov 2012 #63
Yeah, it's pretty much all a big conspiracy against you jberryhill Nov 2012 #70
No - just Trolls/ attorneys who FAIL to disclose they are a lawyer - laserhaas Nov 2012 #73
Lol... jberryhill Nov 2012 #74
It always amazes me - how much attorneys HATE anyone who learns the Law laserhaas Nov 2012 #75
I provide reference, you provide what? Crackpot court filings? Try again. BlueNoteSpecial Nov 2012 #69
Huh! - "J-" has not provided "any" filings or case cites and has just revealed he is an attorney laserhaas Nov 2012 #72
Methinks the counselor doth protest too much. BlueNoteSpecial Nov 2012 #76
Yes - he has drawn a line in the sand - and still fails (miserably) to make a valid point laserhaas Nov 2012 #77
It reeks of hypebole, and misdirection. BlueNoteSpecial Nov 2012 #78
Here's a few items the inflexible sword of truth & public forums made happen laserhaas Nov 2012 #79
We ALL have value, my Brother... BlueNoteSpecial Nov 2012 #80
Thanks - "BlueNote--" laserhaas Nov 2012 #83
J is arguing with incongruous banter and I object to his lack of foundation laserhaas Nov 2012 #56
This type of advocacy ensures rich psychopaths can circumvent the law... Larry Ogg Nov 2012 #38
Can I repeat/ quote you = "Larry Ogg"? laserhaas Nov 2012 #58
Feel free to repeat or quote anything I say. Larry Ogg Nov 2012 #67
Thanks - your avatar and remarks are so apropos to the issues at hand laserhaas Nov 2012 #68
I am not concerned with J's interpretations of facts or reality, however... Larry Ogg Nov 2012 #84
I will look up Psycholpathology 101 - if Pitten's wins - and thank you for seeking the Truth. laserhaas Nov 2012 #85
K & R AzDar Nov 2012 #29
TY - 'AzDar' laserhaas Nov 2012 #44
K&R Hubert Flottz Nov 2012 #30
I agree - whole heartedly - 'Hubert Flottz' - may justice come laserhaas Nov 2012 #59
K/R Window Nov 2012 #31
Appreciate it 'Window' laserhaas Nov 2012 #45
Forget Teapot Dome and Watergate. This is huge if judges were bought. Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2012 #33
keep kicked! goclark Nov 2012 #34
Thanks - 'goclark' laserhaas Nov 2012 #47
We will NEVER be able to prove "bought" -- that is why Mitten's money is Off Shore laserhaas Nov 2012 #46
The CLERK just put the brief in the record today - THANKS EVERYBODY laserhaas Nov 2012 #86
Posting to be able to find this thread later HubertHeaver Nov 2012 #87
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»BREAKING - II - DE Fed Cl...»Reply #20