Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: BREAKING - II - DE Fed Clerk Refuses to Docket Romney/ Bain Litigation until After Election [View all]freshwest
(53,661 posts)17. Thanks for keeping on this. Hes' not the only one who has been playing the system to loot the world.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
BREAKING - II - DE Fed Clerk Refuses to Docket Romney/ Bain Litigation until After Election [View all]
laserhaas
Nov 2012
OP
shit dogCREEP will have to flee (like his grandpappy did to Mexico) the U.S. After Tomorrow...
triplepoint
Nov 2012
#1
Agree with much 'Diclotican' - if he does not steal this, he may finally face a full investigation
laserhaas
Nov 2012
#51
BTW - the seizures would also be the billions Traub has and the end of MNAT & Ropes Gray
laserhaas
Nov 2012
#53
A complicated insight - except there are pieces to the puzzle you still don't have
laserhaas
Nov 2012
#54
I'm not so sure about the cheating part 'triplepoint' (but hope you are right)
laserhaas
Nov 2012
#5
The Repuks plan was after the election to drop the boom on Mitt so that Paul would become president
awake
Nov 2012
#3
The integrity of the judicial process is sacrosanct - All hail Citizens United
socialindependocrat
Nov 2012
#7
Thanks for keeping on this. Hes' not the only one who has been playing the system to loot the world.
freshwest
Nov 2012
#17
Wow! Really? I wasn't paying attention during the 2008 Republican primaries...
ChaoticTrilby
Nov 2012
#32
And your NON party remark is absurd. The court approved of the contracts naming me as party
laserhaas
Nov 2012
#23
You really should read the history of crackpot court filings from this person
jberryhill
Nov 2012
#36
Calling names is extreme bad form and exposes your bias - R U in the legal profession?
laserhaas
Nov 2012
#48
Ah HA - so you ARE an attorney. Circling that "blue wall" of silence/ protection
laserhaas
Nov 2012
#63
I provide reference, you provide what? Crackpot court filings? Try again.
BlueNoteSpecial
Nov 2012
#69
Huh! - "J-" has not provided "any" filings or case cites and has just revealed he is an attorney
laserhaas
Nov 2012
#72
Yes - he has drawn a line in the sand - and still fails (miserably) to make a valid point
laserhaas
Nov 2012
#77
I will look up Psycholpathology 101 - if Pitten's wins - and thank you for seeking the Truth.
laserhaas
Nov 2012
#85
We will NEVER be able to prove "bought" -- that is why Mitten's money is Off Shore
laserhaas
Nov 2012
#46